Received: from mail-ye0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:62058) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TfBmE-0003Kn-BE; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:26 -0800 Received: by mail-ye0-f189.google.com with SMTP id r9sf1944495yen.16 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+1aEDqauVWVIpRa++1Ml6oJv/qQ99DgQdY+nleAILuE=; b=O4g3bdzZ9JWlW3asbyGdFBLtq+Emb7YqYOSh0pFgDGzJXU5pNLgwH0zbFUQHmeAaQ8 rPTZ3s+2aCvYPbtvE/wHb8rERMKzLUGXTvnEhhgjb4sP4m8WUX1A/v4sGpMk4Cq/EZQK GnBGDEpmw8qZSQ8nMcAGKlHIvzShUbeEwMgEwhdWZOAdTxMu3YkiXXEvWgwBcDKS+gLf pGPAtMDRGAdPHUkz8snq84zbqHe4z3jUmX1kig1bWTp4pURqUa+MXXm7Y0GLGKqXbhkg hRAPxLQQWkBGFkuM78Rjgp9xZtA1oa524/evFqpT/INRw+vgLbkh2TDCiVCaTIIwmIND Whrg== Received: by 10.49.12.238 with SMTP id b14mr1714812qec.18.1354463292001; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.105.38 with SMTP id gj6ls1400515qeb.11.gmail; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.165.34 with SMTP id yv2mr2487073veb.10.1354463291365; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.165.34 with SMTP id yv2mr2487072veb.10.1354463291342; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id es5si3205077vdb.2.2012.12.02.07.48.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.49; Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r6so922687vbi.36 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.11.2 with SMTP id pc2mr6274631vcb.10.1354463291215; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.233 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 07:47:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <3c1628ec-40a0-41fd-90a9-65e110d9ab0a@googlegroups.com> <748b91a9-e6b3-485e-8049-0f5d2521350e@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:47:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54eec40558f0c04cfe08f11 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54eec40558f0c04cfe08f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FWIW, I define {srana} in lojban as follows: {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u bu'a ce'u} And actually being able to say *what* that bu'a is is what led me to a post much earlier about "srana3", which indeed, I now realise, would make {srana} essentially identical to {ckini}. (With a srana3, the definition becomes {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u ce'u me'au ce'u}) Thus, I currently believe that srana can be defined in terms of ckini as such: {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u ce'u ckini lo ka co'e} Things that are relevant to each other are simply related by an obvious relationship. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o On 2 December 2012 08:02, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, la gleki wrote: > >> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:09 PM, la gleki wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:17 AM, tijlan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2, >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -- a >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>> of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly >>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>> other things). Consider: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a girl >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} could >>>>>>>>> possibly mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, may be it's not that something is wrong with >>>>>>>> {sera'a/pe/srana} but rather wrong usage and/or glossing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *srana x1 pertains to/is germane/relevant to/concerns/is >>>>>>>> related/associated with/is about x2.* >>>>>>>> *ckini x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by >>>>>>>> relationship x3.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If we arbitrarily chose parts of those definitions we'd get >>>>>>>> * srana x1 is relevant to x2 >>>>>>>> ckini x1 is relevant to x2 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> which is nonsense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ckini wouldn't be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and for >>>>>>> another, it isn't "relevant", it's "related". The Cold War isn't relevant >>>>>>> to WWII, but it is related (by being a direct result of it). >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, it should be >>>>>> * srana x1 is releted to x2* >>>>>> * ckini x1 is related to x2 by relationship x3* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes them >>>>> synonyms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru = {klama zi'o zi'o}). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Haven't you read my previous post? I mean that choosing words from full >>>> definitions ARBITRARILY can lead to this result which is nonsense. >>>> ju'o it's all bad glossing. >>>> I suggest that srana refers to topic and ckini means "to be associated >>>> with". >>>> to dedicate is {finfriti}, {tecu'u} etc. >>>> >>> >>> No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.e. ko'a has >>> something to do with ko'e. >>> >>> While it is true that the topic of something is pertinent, something >>> which is pertinent is not necessarily the topic. >>> >> >> Then what is your opinion about my first post? Is it true that "topic" >> brivla has right to exist on it's own? >> > > My opinion is that sera'a serves the purpose. As I said, "that which is > pertinent to A" is a superset of "the topic of A". > > >> Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most certainly >>> /not/ the topic of it. >>> >>> >>>> (Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as >>>>> whatever place it's in, but just that it's not important. For example, >>>>> {ko'a klama zi'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't/ an origin or >>>>> destination, it just means that they don't matter. Dissenters should use >>>>> zo'e instead.) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think the CLL says almost the same. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If {srana} really gives us thematic role then all the other "is >>>>>>>> relevant to" meanings can be assigned to {ckini/seki'i}. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/** >>>> msg/lojban-beginners/-/**UZopTp21hiIJ >>>> . >>>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** >>>> googlegroups.com. >>>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J. >> >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec54eec40558f0c04cfe08f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FWIW, I define {srana} in lojban as follows:
{.i lo ka ce'u srana c= e'u cu ka ce'u bu'a ce'u}
And actually being able= to say *what* that bu'a is is what led me to a post much earlier about= "srana3", which indeed, I now realise, would make {srana} essent= ially identical to {ckini}.
(With a srana3, the definition becomes {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'= ;u cu ka ce'u ce'u me'au ce'u})

Th= us, I currently believe that srana can be defined in terms of ckini as such= :
{.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u ce'u ckini lo ka = co'e}
Things that are relevant to each other are simply relat= ed by an obvious relationship.

.i mi'e la tsan= i mu'o

On 2 December 2012 08:02, Jonathan Jones <e= yeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:= 48 AM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:=
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2,= 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2= , 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com= > wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 201= 2 at 11:09 PM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6= :17 AM, tijlan <jbot...@gmail.com> wr= ote:

On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek <jan...@gmail.com> wrote:=
> This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is.

An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2, for instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -- a work
of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly many
other things). Consider:

la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli

This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a girl -- it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl.

I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} coul= d possibly mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain.

Well, may be it's no= t that something is wrong with {sera'a/pe/srana} but rather wrong usage= and/or glossing.

srana=A0x1 pertains to/is ger= mane/relevant to/concerns/is related/associated with/is about x2.
ckini =A0x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by relationshi= p x3.

If we arbitrarily chose parts of those d= efinitions we'd get
=A0 srana x1 is relevant to x2
=A0 ckini = =A0x1 is relevant to x2
which is nonsense.

ckini wouldn&#= 39;t be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and for another, it isn&#= 39;t "relevant", it's "related". The Cold War isn&#= 39;t relevant to WWII, but it is related (by being a direct result of it).<= br>

Sorry, it should be=A0
=A0 srana x1 is releted to x2
=A0 ckini = =A0x1 is related to x2=A0by relationship x3

Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes them sy= nonyms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru =3D {klama zi'o zi= 'o}).

Haven= 't you read my previous post? I mean that choosing words from full defi= nitions ARBITRARILY can lead to this result which is nonsense.
ju'o it's all bad glossing.
I suggest that srana ref= ers to topic and ckini means "to be associated with".
t= o dedicate is {finfriti}, {tecu'u} etc.

No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.= e. ko'a has something to do with ko'e.

While it is true that= the topic of something is pertinent, something which is pertinent is not n= ecessarily the topic.

Then what is your = opinion about my first post? Is it true that "topic" brivla has r= ight to exist on it's own?

My opinion is that sera'a serves the purpose. As I said, "that whi= ch is pertinent to A" is a superset of "the topic of A".
=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border= -left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most certainly /n= ot/ the topic of it.
=A0
(Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as w= hatever place it's in, but just that it's not important. For exampl= e, {ko'a klama zi'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't= / an origin or destination, it just means that they don't matter. Disse= nters should use zo'e instead.)

I think the CLL says alm= ost the same.
=A0
=A0
=A0
If {srana} really g= ives us thematic role then all the other "is relevant to" meaning= s can be assigned to {ckini/seki'i}.

--
mu'= o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i d= oi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your fath= er. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/UZopTp21hiIJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com= .
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@g= ooglegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= u>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa = bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am yo= ur father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

= .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54eec40558f0c04cfe08f11--