Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:52724) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TgE01-0000QN-0Z; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:22:54 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f61.google.com with SMTP id wz12sf3956713pbc.16 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:22:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qSR9VcvI4fvLmqZX1szcq424c9lYCyDs0yM2pAk2zlY=; b=lWaFdp4ouSVqHQ4sVDy90yTuBQU0K4ojUCnxwMeoB109L8rAVFQzQvNc7BOiP4UJi/ MvBqi+jm3CjAvBvre2wvNMWvByGu/dJSfZx8VTCjDOGPI6zjdqBlVPjHdHqgYBBn+mB7 UsH+XEedDs6Wv7mz5m4zJyvGHlJBvCrhNKH7vTJrjU8SQDpCwrv30NVoVX8wvAn+ben+ GmFvySg3ybDWQgtjRl47iiG8eHhhQhfwD11yAG6QTSz3kIzoyfdHDmWM09lr6iiWq0Os wEHRS7cHLtDF539zUKzUeA3qh7efDI7XroZX9/A+zUotQoqUyCwW/6mxcJO+KtJv0/vu GOqg== Received: by 10.49.87.1 with SMTP id t1mr3504638qez.41.1354710162102; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:22:42 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.39.234 with SMTP id s10ls845164qek.32.gmail; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:22:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.87.9 with SMTP id t9mr3688772qez.16.1354710160825; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 04:22:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 04:22:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <96205a36-c08f-4ebe-877e-112c22a5aefc@googlegroups.com> <5c52564a-f822-49b1-b8c9-745f53613b34@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/18.0.1025.151 Chrome/18.0.1025.151 Safari/535.19,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On 5 Gru, 10:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:34 AM, ianek wrote: > > I don't think {nu} is good for describing relationships, rather {ka}. > > When in doubt, you can always use {su'u}. I get the feeling that {nu} > > is somewhat overused. > > {nu} is the NU equivalent of {lo}. It's never wrong. No. {su'u} is the NU equivalent of {lo}: generalized abstractor (how); x1 is [bridi] as a non-specific abstraction of type x2 {nu} is "generalized event abstractor; x1 is state/process/achievement/ activity of [bridi]." That means, {nu} can stand for each of: {za'i}, {pu'e}, {mu'u}, {zu'o}, maybe {li'i} (but I doubt that; experience is not an event), but not for {du'u}, {jei}, {ka}, {ni}, {si'o} and of course {su'u}, which is more general. mu'o mi'e ianek > > > > > > > > > > > =A0mu'o mi'e ianek > > > On 5 Gru, 04:33, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Jonathan Jones > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:29 PM, tijlan wrote: > > > > >> On 4 December 2012 10:12, Jonathan Jones wrote= : > > > >> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 AM, tijlan > > wrote: > > > > >> >> On 3 December 2012 04:15, Jonathan Jones > > wrote: > > > >> >> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Annie > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> How do you get "is dedicated to" out of "is related to"? > > > > >> >> > I'd like to know that myself. > > > > >> >> If I wrote a book in dedication to koha and made that explicit = on a > > > >> >> page, a link would have been created between the book and koha. > > > >> >> Suppose koha is a high-profile celebrity and my book happens to= be > > > >> >> monumentally controversial for its own content; koha's manager > > doesn't > > > >> >> appreciate the publicized unduly link and calls me demanding th= at > > {lo > > > >> >> cukta co'u srana ko'a tai zo'e}, where {zo'e} refers to the fac= t > > that > > > >> >> koha's name is on the book's particular page unrelated to the > > book's > > > >> >> topic itself. > > > > >> >> mu'o > > > > >> > Not only is that example extremely contrived, it is also not an > > example > > > >> of > > > >> > srana being "dedicated to", and I highly doubt any manager would > > say "A > > > >> book > > > >> > is completed pertinent to ko'a in the obvious form" to yell at > > someone > > > >> for > > > >> > putting a name in a book. More likely they'd just say "Why is > > {name}'s > > > >> name > > > >> > in you book? I want it out, NOW!" > > > > >> Still, "x1 is dedicated to x2" is a kind of relation, just as "x1 > > > >> plans x2 for process x3" (platu) is. > > > > > Yes, but neither of those are srana. > > > > =A0 In my opinion the discussion here defines ckini too broadly. =A0s= rana > > has a > > > broad meaning, and it's basically the relationship that "pe/ne" has w= ith > > > the two sumti have. =A0ckini, on the other hand, is more specifically= a > > > kinship relationship. =A0The x1 and x2 would basically have to belong= to > > the > > > same set, or at best one being a member of the superset of the other. > > =A0For > > > example, I don't think that "la djan" and "lo zdani be la djan" would > > > properly be described as being a ckini relationship, despite the fact= you > > > could argue =A0that "la djan ckini lo zdani be la djan lo nu se zdani= " is > > > valid and true. =A0But I could say something like "lo mlatu cu ckini = lo > > cinfo > > > lo nu jutsi". =A0The preceding is just my opinion. YMMV > > > =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.