Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:52958) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Th2ZH-0005OK-5j; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:54 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f61.google.com with SMTP id wz12sf405411pbc.16 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=07ytwT/Q8KtfrYCUaTevjZ3VMnpa8oXI8BZn93rkVak=; b=JyYu4J5nswbeOcO0hg+d9V+qr2YNryqT+efnYayDjqEpKCrFW6qEjVWm9FlpDQEIgk GsArRb/3Kmo+lukpkND+KTVrvRfmG4I+vSbXuYPLSFx3vsb06ScR5/SBmiplqh5vwRkU izSbv0tozn4NjUFgE3rRZfNb7aoZl83gHedW999ZOOko1Nei4xS0cgWEXdTHh90r6Op4 1k/wo3KS3BtZIQNXSh5PDMoVIeQhDjwt0VMsD2FvI9tQ9M+iIKAnJ7bdt+9VE42xKumV SaY4YNFXpYfpyo1oih+8mt70OYs24dF59jGOPeJSd9Yvugnzq3FqplK6nP95ii5I6ROa HUuw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=07ytwT/Q8KtfrYCUaTevjZ3VMnpa8oXI8BZn93rkVak=; b=soLBDFKu/bhFb50kqC4oSYLQbugD+3Vnavb3+1qKpu7c6ar3v2V9Z913Th5m2V6c1z d/7AUBcSIbJr1ippgS3hj9ov+N+x4TG8qir3Cr7lz1IDUAI+S60CPNI6hRR/oO2Pty/j 6NufosDWEwm2PVHn1x1c7Aw328tQQAsszkW3haOE5liotjZ2WDH0PzMSy6Yh87/GsNB6 CmJFP6AfrujQ0Sz7khUTUMGHH2N5lfMyc6500a3V2uiWG9EW+ilHs1wjtKI2sckwmm06 W0hvOspMpc5YnjySyf7qMwSLMHpTrsMwJEGMPU9v1ANBmrMvzrHxVfBBxUdBPg/Ny1uN MLKg== Received: by 10.49.38.194 with SMTP id i2mr1380809qek.30.1354904548707; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:28 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.0.176 with SMTP id 16ls2372431qef.41.gmail; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.189.16 with SMTP id dc16mr4860812qab.0.1354904547400; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.189.16 with SMTP id dc16mr4860810qab.0.1354904547380; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qc0-f192.google.com (mail-qc0-f192.google.com [209.85.216.192]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r17si2816824qcp.1.2012.12.07.10.22.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.192 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.192; Received: by mail-qc0-f192.google.com with SMTP id c21so374248qcs.29 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.108.200 with SMTP id hm8mr2257669igb.10.1354904547218; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:22:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:22:26 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Cc: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com, cowan@mercury.ccil.org Message-Id: <12451bd9-6861-4830-a8d0-c5c5f382fe2c@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20121207165143.GE26753@mercury.ccil.org> References: <95cdbee4-7ddc-4f7d-bb48-4591b7c3d915@googlegroups.com> <50C10003.1080806@lojban.org> <5406c1d2-ee78-4b41-ab68-06b7cf99dce7@googlegroups.com> <20121207165143.GE26753@mercury.ccil.org> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.192 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_414_4966893.1354904546727" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_414_4966893.1354904546727 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Friday, December 7, 2012 8:51:43 PM UTC+4, John Cowan wrote: > > la gleki scripsit: > > > {na'e} says that we are somewere at another point but on the same scale. > > {no'e} says we are in the middle of the same scale. > > {to'e} says that we are at the opposite point of the same scale. > > Right. > > > {na'i} says that we are outside this scale (i.e. this predicate > > relationship) > > "Na'i" says that there's something wrong with the way the statement is > formulated. "Na'i I drove my car to work today" is a true statement, > since I don't have a car and in fact don't drive. > > > {na}. Here I have a problem. According to what I draw {na} means that we > > are not at this point of this scale and may be even outside this scale. > > So for me {na} is (warning! bad grammar follows) {na'i ja na'e}. > > "Na" is not about scales either. It says no more and no less than that > the rest of the sentence is untrue. "Na'e censa" is "secular", but > "ti na na'e censa" does not reduce to "ti censa" logically, though it > may do so pragmatically. > > > Anyway, I want all types of negation to fit on the same scheme. > > They don't, and aren't intended to. Lojban's round pegs will not fit > in your square holes. > Then explain me how one {nai} can give birth both to round pegs and square nails? I showed on my table that {na} means either {na} or outside the scale. This is what you are saying (""Na" is not about scales either") > -- > John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan > Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a > computer > mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality > is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction, > as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a > contract. > --Specht v. Netscape > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/8qlIguhEM44J. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_414_4966893.1354904546727 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, December 7, 2012 8:51:43 PM UTC+4, John Cowan wrote:la gleki scripsit:

> {na'e} says that we are somewere at another point but on the same = scale.
> {no'e} says we are in the middle of the same scale.
> {to'e} says that we are at the opposite point of the same scale.

Right.

> {na'i} says that we are outside this scale (i.e. this predicate=20
> relationship)

"Na'i" says that there's something wrong with the way the statement is
formulated.  "Na'i I drove my car to work today" is a true stateme= nt,
since I don't have a car and in fact don't drive.

> {na}. Here I have a problem. According to what I draw {na} means t= hat we=20
> are not at this point of this scale and may be even outside this s= cale.
> So for me {na} is (warning! bad grammar follows) {na'i ja na'e}.

"Na" is not about scales either.  It says no more and no less than= that
the rest of the sentence is untrue.  "Na'e censa" is "secular", bu= t
"ti na na'e censa" does not reduce to "ti censa" logically, though it
may do so pragmatically.

> Anyway, I want all types of negation to fit on the same scheme.

They don't, and aren't intended to.  Lojban's round pegs will not = fit
in your square holes.

Then explain me how one {nai} can give= birth both to round pegs and square nails?
I showed on my table = that {na} means either {na} or outside the scale. This is what you are sayi= ng
(""Na" is not about scales either")


--=20
John Cowan  co...@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a c= omputer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inactio= n,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a c= ontract.
       --Specht v. Netscape

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/8qlIguhEM44J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_414_4966893.1354904546727--