Received: from mail-pa0-f55.google.com ([209.85.220.55]:54681) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqSBW-0000M0-UI; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:33:05 -0800 Received: by mail-pa0-f55.google.com with SMTP id fb1sf8681792pad.20 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:date:from:to :message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GLPOg/lVYvoDu6vHd91pW5Ofw1Hd+/fl2mLqFF0qipM=; b=pRm0+8tWcw5/IhMl8Y0/BD45kHMnPTW5ewEZup4dnijrMj9dmH4Eitf1UcReaCo4/1 YMyuiwplvPEZfllsYz1JySj2lnAxQYCoh2h9U695BV2Nwr+wm3uTT7CGtyPRDxIqCKKW Uw77QT5rDgzw0yjZdKUm7RqdTgKdUrgpDZtmfA5ik4/yzAdEAn8yAfaELqLZwTj46l1W OdDKLkvP9IhROhWUethNc2oqu6SiHLVtYRtc49E0aCNtgRWcqoXFKWSPKpc+Rc+PKlyk fDNvZScWC/H+JGWTnNauDmA36mE2GwLPPlAPWA/3JBKiYp5KSkfX7jZw4op1YrxbUaDU jemQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:date:from:to :message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GLPOg/lVYvoDu6vHd91pW5Ofw1Hd+/fl2mLqFF0qipM=; b=tDFmGhHkTTepFmgDOkjk98COU/snNzChCd2Mfo5Qs79jhNaRCISxi3skQtSgh3OOML aafT7QUrV7sfgaqYwgob54LmiQXEdFYRkw1VSBffdC8w9YlGRyXFTlbnwYnyjrvZPOnI 84EgzkQcqZ2Vj0EClqusu5neNI6EXzlORTo0Pb3IpxeH4qlwuB+F7B1uI6oyGO6uUY7x UoJpWCjcxdCNgsIMZ5pyOtM5xtLFyTo16zXnVI1ip+LcczrOWJ7Lqj4Of1vwqJEbp88g NEVMPOZRFTiuu6XQvN+rd0r1VxQ3ig4V2mtBWuCzCywxwX7u89ZnG3umVuh1K8b7StRf F7bg== X-Received: by 10.49.58.167 with SMTP id s7mr7166785qeq.5.1357147972530; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.62.71 with SMTP id w7ls5794661qer.88.gmail; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.198.196 with SMTP id ep4mr22230807qab.3.1357147971275; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.0.141 with SMTP id 13msqab; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:21:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.15.100 with SMTP id w4mr6225695qec.26.1356974512276; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:21:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:21:51 -0800 (PST) From: "neizyn." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <21ad0ed5-0baa-4ab8-8cc1-10d60b5274e5@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <7ab190d5-2f38-459d-921b-51a49a00fd2e@googlegroups.com> References: <7ab190d5-2f38-459d-921b-51a49a00fd2e@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Sandwich is better than eternal love. Proof. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: sjacket@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_438_14586624.1356974511917" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_438_14586624.1356974511917 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The trick lies in saying that nothing is better than eternal love--which can be misread, or at least given the opposite intonation of the intended meaning. And the other thing is, saying a sandwich "is better than nothing" could be damning with faint praise, but in this case it acquires a "one in hand, 2 in the bush" kind of meaning--meaning it has potentially infinite value. Is there a way to say every alternative to being loved (e.g. going skating, or even not owning anything) is better? But I think the implication is here too is that LOVE CAN BE POSSESSED hence the *eternal* because you have it always. Well, to me it seems it's not so much *eternal* as *life-long* but..."I would rather have a sandwich now than someone's life-long love"? "Does being loved forever fill my stomach now?" Priorities. On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:43:07 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote: > This question appeared in the russian casnu stuzi. > > What can be better than eternal love? Nothing. > Sandwich is better than nothing. > Therefore, sandwich is better than eternal love. > > How can we disprove this statement in lojban? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/EjEfmkgs97sJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_438_14586624.1356974511917 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The trick lies in saying that nothing is better than eternal love--whi= ch can be misread, or at least given the opposite intonation of the intende= d meaning.
And the other thing is, saying a sandwich "is better t= han nothing" could be damning with faint praise, but in this case it acquir= es a "one in hand, 2 in the bush" kind of meaning--meaning it has potential= ly infinite value.
 
Is there a way to say every a= lternative to being loved (e.g. going skating, or even not owning anything)= is better?
But I think the implication is here too is that LOVE = CAN BE POSSESSED hence the eternal because you have it always. Wel= l, to me it seems it's not so much eternal as life-long b= ut..."I would rather have a sandwich now than someone's life-long love"?&nb= sp;"Does being loved forever fill my stomach now?" Priorities.
 
 

On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:43:= 07 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote:
This qu= estion appeared in the russian casnu stuzi.

What can be= better than eternal love? Nothing. 
Sandwich is better than nothi= ng.
Therefore, sandwich is better than eternal love.
How can we disprove this statement in lojban?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/EjEfmkgs97sJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_438_14586624.1356974511917--