Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:34197) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TyGNH-00070J-Ll; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:28 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c11sf3993790qca.6 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vYiSZm54i7jarjUh3vZ7usvMvmm7t6eWc9daBL/OCwA=; b=Rs3YIN02E7yNL7KufPnQ795nn86Fr6PVaHqhlU+oEyPqEKYgtOQ/2vg93UvyCe6Jt2 oEac/mIWDbje9uRFHSei8zqqLGB17P6XUpOMyII3G2M5EhV3pC23Y6KSFsu+7lp7xKEI gcdNQFhKZAgCRQPLOkMf8ex9dGJc8Vsi+ajAX5nyvotEoASGLUi+fviqLnKTWrCOiM/3 WgOagc9FTScd/KLa4WpPzNbzP2kH404/mj+j1kRWSH/ItUVKDilY8HM9/FtfuNRHZjI6 MI4RgEW+FeYS4BPR4E7pZ2yp5nlkiT7ke4wMCgiOhmoE8JYW0t9BhnOl59rNlrEf2Kdt o9Gw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vYiSZm54i7jarjUh3vZ7usvMvmm7t6eWc9daBL/OCwA=; b=z5HwS14IBry401S8IQo/FzqrqZaX7w1qnVKfRcGMMk8HIsPQZGPVFNnH1jX/R4gZ+0 b0WeblzoeTY8BInjlIHfkoumwhG0fogvGQ6Hbk03cKe2o2pnfksn8N96c1hcTyhYFuoD e6YCYS2F56PwdBrbA8pZJtQtvXkmFw99E7V3M61VofjyZqLUM3RUURgyabvN/5C7JZTd 7XNppAblk1EZ/ArMuSrXenM6H2rGgynbr87dFBu6Jz+v0l33EZ2w6Yv5gnkCW4OWT5gV zs1wp8LysHbTXsVkxeT2u4otEN8Pem+/waOEuaOCiUWWiGwtmL9/3OZRDxaCtX8sK+1r 6Sjw== X-Received: by 10.50.196.135 with SMTP id im7mr237909igc.1.1359009195818; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.153.201 with SMTP id vi9ls563950igb.40.gmail; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.5.174 with SMTP id t14mr231597igt.11.1359009194922; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:33:14 -0800 (PST) From: guskant To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <7993ccf4-52ce-465b-b92f-fadee95d2d30@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: {ko} and {do} with .a-/.e- attitudinals MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_226_33302590.1359009194361" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_226_33302590.1359009194361 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 01:44:52 UTC+9, guskant a =E9crit : > > > Le samedi 17 novembre 2012 09:23:29 UTC+9, mudri a =E9crit : > > Should {ko} be used in sentences marked with {.e'o}? It's something I= =20 > see often (and usually do myself), but {do} is generally used with {.e'u}= =20 > in particular. My thought was that, because attitudinals beginning with "= a"=20 > and "e" (and some "i") show that the marked text is a hypothetical=20 > assertion, not a real one, using {do} would be the correct thing for the= =20 > hypothetical world (in which la'e {do} is actually doing what is said in= =20 > the sentence). .iepei > > > > {do} may be a hypothetical one as well as a real one, depending on the=20 > context. For example, > ganai do da'i morsi ginai mi jbena=20 > The whole sentence may be true even if {do na morsi}. > > {ko} and {do} are defined as follows: > ko sumka'i le tersku noi le cusku cu minde ja cpedu le nu ke'a gasnu la'e= =20 > le selsku > do sumka'i le tersku > > The difference is only the part after {noi}, which adds the speaker's=20 > attitude of {minde ja cpedu}. > > "{ko} with {.e'o}" means therefore "{do} with the speaker's attitudes=20 > {minde ja cpedu} and {.e'o}". Because {.e'o} is an attitudinal of {cpedu}= ,=20 > it means "{do} with the speaker's attitude of {minde ja cpedu je cpedu}",= =20 > which is equal to "{do} with the speaker's attitude of {cpedu}". > Logically thinking, I realized that {minde ja cpedu je cpedu} is not equal= =20 to {cpedu} but to {minde je cpedu ja cpedu}. I mean "(order OR request) AND= =20 request" is equal to "(order AND request) OR (request AND request)", or=20 shortly "(order AND request) OR request". =20 > "{do} with {.e'o}" also means "{do} with the speaker's attitude of=20 > {cpedu}".=20 > "{ko} with {.e'o}" and "{do} with {.e'o}" have therefore the same meaning= . > > Comparing {do .e'o}, {ko .e'o} and {ko}, {do .e'o} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of request", {ko .e'o} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of ((order AND request)=20 OR request)", {ko} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of (order OR request)". I conclude that {do .e'o} means pure request only, while {ko .e'o} has=20 broader meaning that may imply also "order AND request", and {ko} has=20 still broader meaning that may imply also pure order. I drew a Venn diagram on my conlclusion: http://guskant.github.com/lojbo/mindecpedu.svg =20 > {.e'u} is an attitudinal of {stidi}. "{ko} with {.e'u}" means, with the= =20 > same procedure, "{do} with the speaker's attitudes of {minde ja cpedu je= =20 > stidi}". On the other hand, "{do} with {.e'u}" means only "{do} with the= =20 > speaker's attitude of {stidi}", which is clearly different from the meani= ng=20 > of "{ko} with {.e'u}". Both are acceptable, and the speaker needs to sele= ct=20 > one of them depending on one's attitude. > > In my opinion, however, the definition of {ko} should include also the=20 > attitudes of {curmi}, {pacna}, {stidi}, {djica}, {bilga}, because=20 > imperative expressions in natural languages include them. If so, "{ko} wi= th=20 > {.e'u}" and "{do} with {.e'u}" would have the same meaning. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den= . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_226_33302590.1359009194361 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 01:44:52 UTC+9, guskant a =E9crit :<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;bord= er-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
Le samedi 17 novembre 2012 = 09:23:29 UTC+9, mudri a =E9crit :
> Should {ko} be used in sentences = marked with {.e'o}? It's something I see often (and usually do myself), but= {do} is generally used with {.e'u} in particular. My thought was that, bec= ause attitudinals beginning with "a" and "e" (and some "i") show that the m= arked text is a hypothetical assertion, not a real one, using {do} would be= the correct thing for the hypothetical world (in which la'e {do} is actual= ly doing what is said in the sentence). .iepei



{do} may be a= hypothetical one as well as a real one, depending on the context. For exam= ple,
ganai do da'i morsi ginai mi jbena
The whole sentence may be tr= ue even if {do na morsi}.

{ko} and {do} are defined as follows:
k= o sumka'i le tersku noi le cusku cu minde ja cpedu le nu ke'a gasnu la'e le= selsku
do sumka'i le tersku

The difference is only the part afte= r {noi}, which adds the speaker's attitude of {minde ja cpedu}.

"{ko= } with {.e'o}" means therefore "{do} with the speaker's attitudes {minde ja= cpedu} and {.e'o}". Because {.e'o} is an attitudinal of {cpedu}, it means = "{do} with the speaker's attitude of {minde ja cpedu je cpedu}", which is e= qual to "{do} with the speaker's attitude of {cpedu}".

Logically thinking, I realized that {minde ja cpedu je cped= u} is not equal to {cpedu} but to {minde je cpedu ja cpedu}. I mean "(order= OR request) AND request" is equal to "(order AND request) OR (request AND = request)", or shortly "(order AND request) OR request".
&nbs= p;
"{do} with {.e'o}" als= o means "{do} with the speaker's attitude of {cpedu}".
"{ko} with {.e'o= }" and "{do} with {.e'o}" have therefore the same meaning.


Comparing {do .e'o}, {ko .e'o} and {ko},
=
{do .e'o} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of request",
= {ko .e'o} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of ((order AND request) OR&n= bsp;request)",
{ko} =3D "you with the speaker's attitude of = (order OR request)".
I conclude that {do .e'o} means pu= re request only, while {ko .e'o} has broader meaning that may imply al= so "order AND request", and {ko} has still broader meaning that m= ay imply also pure order.
I drew a Venn diagram on my conlclusion= :
http://guskant.github.com/lojbo/mindecpedu.svg
 
{.e'u= } is an attitudinal of {stidi}. "{ko} with {.e'u}" means, with the same pro= cedure, "{do} with the speaker's attitudes of {minde ja cpedu je stidi}". O= n the other hand, "{do} with {.e'u}" means only "{do} with the speaker's at= titude of {stidi}", which is clearly different from the meaning of "{ko} wi= th {.e'u}". Both are acceptable, and the speaker needs to select one of the= m depending on one's attitude.

In my opinion, however, the definitio= n of {ko} should include also the attitudes of {curmi}, {pacna}, {stidi}, {= djica}, {bilga}, because imperative expressions in natural languages includ= e them. If so, "{ko} with {.e'u}" and "{do} with {.e'u}" would have the sam= e meaning.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_226_33302590.1359009194361--