Received: from mail-da0-f59.google.com ([209.85.210.59]:46533) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UBS5i-0001iv-51; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:54 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f59.google.com with SMTP id q36sf1284369dad.4 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+g5FeQDGP24cvrf5NwY3tAHHENopmjPze0aI59xQM3o=; b=WS4sn9yJoYZ7coBBHwJ6rc1bvcJRLktUxWbFrTHiohCqKl3b2U9ERucbU3Ts1W8dZ0 PbK7c7Dd+P1k0/UlOC7nrs6g2licmi0xKvFYiUYqeRxG8as8zaBoSqetqR7TgfQj90Ke 6PEfkV2inVlBJM4n/w43r+GHkUGEboAsGl4YPDjZSE/WHFXtbRBHRR02AtSTtiPxnf+0 Yjm8du60YMvuqtqoSC73iClsyJDH6zrQ3o5hOmfOzVNVnPrbzs/3qhJ1AhOMrEXKybDY ExTEymhst2AZtkjYOwa+saade/SbOFCxiCp5bEgnFBVJt3D5oS7iDu4tEltwlrSvwWyI pgLQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+g5FeQDGP24cvrf5NwY3tAHHENopmjPze0aI59xQM3o=; b=R0EyWuaZ0AQrUgqeRGXZzc/U4jF0ESHTmRmgBlmBNnD6H0QmLqMjFDVINMK3AsxzAa L/+hzIwhYIMFlq9mQ+aT5shU8cYjSsR259T//OzLLbQFhtB2KSUm4f87EGdpr5tgKYJ5 h7Y0fkstOn+rgeGOX5EjgsiLwEzy8f4YEHpcqdd3Fv5AnSbUqLE4CLL7KQFMcYgM+uG6 vidHs4hO+H30FfQM3wdT8DUaSIVIIv5yid1NKxEnwrZG0LHiCpirAIJwGhKGimZ323ta T1znGiYiWlLZQc2SyCFHpOcShpUvu99bcWypG9IswOc/r4z/PEv380BmNODivoQWlUND VlJQ== X-Received: by 10.50.135.41 with SMTP id pp9mr1919082igb.2.1362152499315; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.42.226 with SMTP id r2ls384352igl.2.gmail; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.163.202 with SMTP id d10mr7940827icy.23.1362152497612; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.163.202 with SMTP id d10mr7940826icy.23.1362152497593; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j7si2313964igc.3.2013.03.01.07.41.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.48; Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j1so5856747oag.21 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.194.35 with SMTP id ht3mr1943889obc.39.1362152497462; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.97.33 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:41:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130301104122.GF2801@samsa.fritz.box> References: <20130121164434.GB4839@samsa.fritz.box> <20130228232043.GE2801@samsa.fritz.box> <20130301104122.GF2801@samsa.fritz.box> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:41:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] On "by standard x" From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e899bdc48304d6ded7e2 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d0444e899bdc48304d6ded7e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:41 AM, v4hn wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:00:28PM -0500, MorphemeAddict wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:20 PM, v4hn wrote: > > > I really hope this does not depend on any particular gismu, > > > because all these places are phrased the very same. > > > Therefore, I would like to have one accepted interpretation of them. > > > > The standard can be any kind of standard, which can be utterly trivial, > > like "by the standard of me". "Standard of judgment" is just one example > > that makes sense in the context of {fenki}. > > > > That interpretation is highly ambiguous. "by the standard of me" is > polysemous > w.r.t. judgment and comparison. That's the reason why I would like to know > what it means to put a material object/individual into this place. > > No, stevo is right. It IS ambiguous, but that's because you asked about a specifically ambiguous construction (a bare "mi"). If you had said "...lo ka mi jinvi lo du'u ce'u fenki" that would unambiguously state you are judging it by the x1 to be fenki by the standard you consider something to be fenki. If you said "...lo ka karbi ce'u mi", you be asserting that it would be by comparison to you. By just saying "mi" it could be either (or even possibly more wild ideas involving "mi"). I merely asserted that most people would probably assume a simple person/people/nation in that piece of fenki would assume a standard of judgment. But if the sentence had be, for example "lo mi mlatu cu fenki lo mi gerku", you would be more likely asserting that your cat is crazy in comparison to your dog... --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --f46d0444e899bdc48304d6ded7e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at = 5:41 AM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:00:28PM -0500, MorphemeAddict = wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:20 PM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
> > I really hope this does not depend on any= particular gismu,
> > because all these places are phrased the very same.
> > Therefore, I would like to have one accepted interpretation of th= em.
>
> The standard can be any kind of standard, which can be utterly trivial= ,
> like "by the standard of me". "Standard of judgment&quo= t; is just one example
> that makes sense in the context of {fenki}.
>

That interpretation is highly ambiguous. "by the standard of me&= quot; is polysemous
w.r.t. judgment and comparison. That's the reason why I would like to k= now
what it means to put a material object/individual into this place.


=A0 No, stevo is right. =A0It IS ambiguous, but that= 's because you asked about a specifically ambiguous construction (a bar= e "mi"). =A0If you had said "...lo ka mi jinvi lo du'u c= e'u fenki" that would unambiguously state you are judging it by th= e x1 to be fenki by the standard you consider something to be fenki. =A0If = you said "...lo ka karbi ce'u mi", you be asserting that it w= ould be by comparison to you. =A0By just saying "mi" it could be = either (or even possibly more wild ideas involving "mi"). =A0I me= rely asserted that most people would probably assume a simple person/people= /nation in that piece of fenki would assume a standard of judgment. =A0But = if the sentence had be, for example "lo mi mlatu cu fenki lo mi gerku&= quot;, you would be more likely asserting that your cat is crazy in compari= son to your dog...
=A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--f46d0444e899bdc48304d6ded7e2--