Received: from mail-wi0-f192.google.com ([209.85.212.192]:64733) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UBlqa-0000Js-4Y; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:41 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f192.google.com with SMTP id hm11sf208553wib.19 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=hqTPPp1OQJ5navbkgJ9l7yTmgYe+3R6ac01xJr2T9sY=; b=ot5jrpffejg/z8LQ0nyIsNfjEChXxQqtzShemU/K1RK6IxfJ22NVqg3vXMfe9FkKes P8WKva9S2pNbz+g9xDFlnfUO/bhMlLa78XFUPypvCvHXCX7Bic4e2kvWzbT6DILd6+qo ra24J7mEPDMUsgvrzy3maEtP/VGSdJQaVWw3xKmPBdA6Mo3DFRttdmdL9X//SZu0RFcR wPVt1BYpS5WB4llg9Jyg/RjezaKQqTNwnxKh96ERVQBBuPrSyovNCpeHMCPR1Q5oPUZh jFmjGkYDrp2o1Xg8ODOVsxbYU2OG8URFR94wbohHXk9JPhFYSNaFnT5nm6zlZRqTuEkz F6uw== X-Received: by 10.180.73.164 with SMTP id m4mr197253wiv.9.1362228440312; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.86.129 with SMTP id p1ls105032wiz.20.gmail; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.184.9 with SMTP id r9mr14028326eem.7.1362228439337; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.184.9 with SMTP id r9mr14028325eem.7.1362228439327; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si3862039eej.0.2013.03.02.04.47.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dbadaaa.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.218.170]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19159865067 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:47:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:47:17 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] "Closed" Message-ID: <20130302124717.GG2801@samsa.fritz.box> References: <7f5a8d63-d558-4bf5-a41a-4c3129c4ebee@googlegroups.com> <9c8efd02-9a73-4627-9ee4-06ee7ae36cdf@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 12:07:07AM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:42 PM, la gleki wro= te: > > On Saturday, March 2, 2013 10:18:07 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:03 PM, spitaki wrote: > >>> But that's so ambiguous, and the friggen point of lojban is to do away > >>> with ambiguity in every way! > >>> > >> > >> No it isn't. The point is to remove /syntactic/ ambiguity, not /semant= ic/. > >> ba'e remove syntactic ambiguity and ba'e reduce semantic ambiguity by choos= ing different words for different things (unlike 'bank', 'fly', 'date', etc. in NatLangs) > > Can't lojban remove or increase semantic ambiguity too? >=20 > Of course it can. That's what verbosity- or the lack thereof- is for. But > that's not a uniquely Lojbanic thing. It's true of all languages. In > general, semantic ambiguity is inversely proportional to verbosity. >=20 That statement makes much more sense if you replace ambiguity by vagueness. Ambiguity either is or isn't, depending on whether or not more than one distinct class of circumstances is described by the sentence. Vagueness is about the (non-)precision of the class described and decreases with the amount of words you use to describe these circumstances. But ok, of course the distinction between both words always depends on your definition of 'distinct classes', which is vague in itself. v4hn --nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEx9NUACgkQMBKLZs4+wjyiegCffTrkS46b6IbNH7Sdi5dm4dWR da8An3DhyCwFDXY+wt7oScbwSP9L+HUS =8sU7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1--