Received: from mail-ee0-f64.google.com ([74.125.83.64]:40761) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ULDnk-0005fu-NR; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:44 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f64.google.com with SMTP id c1sf2441226eek.19 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=B0hL26mTg8B3pkhbUIyNPKvxisjlA6A0mhqgGmwKyoo=; b=WUej3NnLrYIfL1OZwdKQmLfWT92DKZeMZUqhXp/WyqtRxCoxKXVEpi/D/JFyA4Vd/5 PV9rTAE2QmlyW8PLhuoFgIYhoFu1w2XYHLTO/GHRztDt3i4FMe4eRlKHZb2gtTZCObxo yKetGTPx2hafx89vNnfJ5Kofn5PUKXRAOA/C1ZHrvdKNOFabcGHLFNTMeErCZ+8+mmjB PTgmL8to6yhoLTL9I3vmzGmcpEPntpq1VRQRqvFr8LViF/dy9LmZxWP1IXXKpZ5EgeAK cGffE6Bm1N8Elpd5TTA+y2ycCY0u/y7cSDEDVjIaOlBv6SOeedoTcBVzH9hgl+OTbxL7 fkEw== X-Received: by 10.180.88.133 with SMTP id bg5mr1258803wib.6.1364480848800; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.93.225 with SMTP id cx1ls908927wib.49.gmail; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.111.135 with SMTP id cj7mr20680049eeb.0.1364480848203; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si5555668eej.0.2013.03.28.07.27.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4db80ae5.pool.mediaWays.net [77.184.10.229]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 695508615D1 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:27:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:27:26 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] A question about the sentences understanding in Lojban Message-ID: <20130328142726.GF6592@samsa.fritz.box> References: <20130327212515.GB6592@samsa.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L2Brqb15TUChFOBK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:19:19AM -0700, libifrid@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:52:26PM -0700, libi...@gmail.com wrote:=20 > > > I mean, I know it doesn't make=20 > > > sense, but I understood this language should be understood even by=20 > > > computers, and this means that it does not require thinking or knoled= ge=20 > > > (like the knowledge that that meaning doesn't make sense) for underst= aning=20 > > > sentences.=20 > > > > That conclusion is not entirely true. _Understanding_ regular lojban of= people > > talking to each other is probably not that much easier than understandi= ng english. > > However, at least lojban is not as ambiguous, so you don't have to deal= with=20 > > the problem of parsing the sentence before trying to understand it. > > (I mean, people don't know what "understanding" really means)=20 >=20 > So, you mean that the only advantage of Lojban is that you don't need to= =20 > parse the sentences, but the meaning is indeed ambigous. This does not lo= ok=20 > so big advantage. Isn't it? or did I miss some another advantages of Lojb= an? > As unambiguous as possible. It's very vague though, as all natural language= s are. But that's not what I meant to say. Assuming we would have solved parsing a= nd disambiguation issues for english, it is still hard to "understand" both, disambiguated english and lojban. We are still stuck with the thousands of = years old question of what the meaning of an utterance is. Just wanted to take away your illusion of lojban being "the language you ca= n use to talk to computers". Lojban makes that much easier on the interface (lang= uage) level, but that doesn't solve semantics and scientifically we are not there yet. .= u'iru'e v4hn --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFUU04ACgkQMBKLZs4+wjwkrQCeO2uyOTyFnS+Da6zq20UvdYhO JFkAniorJql/J6q8i2C7zJSeaKrgfOD7 =WrpM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK--