Received: from mail-qc0-f187.google.com ([209.85.216.187]:44312) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UWuk1-0003t8-Kf; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:09 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f187.google.com with SMTP id a6sf2355387qch.24 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/mWkaTxhEW9AhAFP3o5dWg8fzQ5l4F+XfX++kaPRTMo=; b=rjTJmW8QMlGwpiTFoM8VbDitNWjhKLbXu8jeoz8FbF+ZTauZ8qz/RkNttFTy3pBAxZ mG7U393WtxQXFeUgQz1+kHSfFcaoQIJANo8pHu4xpe1awyRNlfSWztAtdfM+ZxpTkpME RNl9c9z62jAk8p5JOO3XHWGH1z55sGJEYNMw3le1dUaW3MAAzcY6+mIR3dMR1OU2Ha7y FUhfZY/EFZAvkFiErUuZ5S0uy2wh8af6fcIkaoXJeBX2DytkamBdlh5FeOhJ23fHa2e7 XpUEDOEYsrpiatd9PneJ9NS80AU8V5ipxVlwr5cai3m1rNCmJv5kp+cRy7ExJMtPci6k lGPQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/mWkaTxhEW9AhAFP3o5dWg8fzQ5l4F+XfX++kaPRTMo=; b=dAOBSPIR90f3Y/ODNcAdfYxSEh4fgn7FM2s0kLH76ufb7cw4DXjNHifds2Ffvujuzs HDvi/tQjRPUiFTWDyzMGKfqcRvObOcOkiugyK2rUg9LcsLXtqDo2i2UtpbJTiujyqgIs MFloji82IbL0uAsKAGPl4pvNPLqhZ1ltGTpl7rPF7kGBEW2GUYRfGm5LOL6fmJOVtNU+ DLj89kq4h69AfvbkphbEXZTkRnshSF2PW4b9Y/KkyIKoZi5B1q/aaE/vGGoNkzwTm+Nd cws/qTZZBfCWEkN5FGVTCl5GhyU7MGATxjjskSngzUiDnQvTZpSAN06vyeh44upNrMT9 1CvA== X-Received: by 10.182.251.233 with SMTP id zn9mr703500obc.33.1367267518771; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:31:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.107.138 with SMTP id hc10ls498069obb.43.gmail; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.230.232 with SMTP id tb8mr678826obc.38.1367267515424; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:31:54 -0700 (PDT) From: mudri To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Mixing tenses MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jammyatjammy@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_316_24290111.1367267514616" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_316_24290111.1367267514616 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is something I've wanted to ask for a while. I can't find a good way= =20 to compare two non-LE-based sumti that are specifically from different=20 tenses. I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying {lo ca broda cu zmadu= lo=20 pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e}, I have to resort to {lo= =20 ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, which seems less than optimal. Is that the way it's done? Or is there something on the bridi level? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den= . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_316_24290111.1367267514616 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is something I've wanted to ask for a while. I can't find a good way t= o compare two non-LE-based sumti that are specifically from different tense= s.

I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying= {lo ca broda cu zmadu lo pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e}= , I have to resort to {lo ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, which seems l= ess than optimal.

Is that the way it's done? Or is= there something on the bridi level?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_316_24290111.1367267514616--