Received: from mail-oa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.219.64]:36196) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UhY1v-00033h-QU; Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:39 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id i10sf2680026oag.29 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fj9EWOrvOyGPFHl/XGk1+kKR/Ctr1R5XkWb+XbDl490=; b=rJK6CT4KwNjJz63TAnWHOrU/2jCUeOrG+GXNvL4tk0Tew+fyvf96FB/RGNkJ6KNPEV KpdzbO2CFiqL3KHinm+SoCbH8roYz0eCqUy2yw3RWQ9thSmOQ9ccdItBhpzaVEk4QkM4 FsizQxH5vyCq/dImT8vf7YtmtEMjHEdExso+4Qercppls9UcyZilx99WTTcr7FX9mL7d zA8SyfO14Uy3qtsKbMWOikYCmk8QMoRUsyTkBSJBto8Ux8aMcZ+KAZ/8HIr2x+4MIGWx eM14KXuibd3GRqnUJroLPRLLMNiSAGzysTAk96WirxqNMkQLkj5QB4FnCORea/egGbKE /gqw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fj9EWOrvOyGPFHl/XGk1+kKR/Ctr1R5XkWb+XbDl490=; b=Hmj8vfCTzgWp0EsVihLOZTBj5k/c1IZgq8UU2jWUJ/xYd2+KvGwMeFDSF9Wbe0wKSZ QhnTQMcxws83w4eyuItmZAZEVNjM3nQcXOFHgQ6uFvUAcsAFw5dzuz8ulCtyu89bbzg4 6ExPR6YEgv7P5e1Nc87zJkWwaBkkm37HqupGPADpr2eGrPwX0zZ7dIEezw9SaNh5FIfb GdgkO4up2pw1YTuIq3R7Ic9a/pAuaDL7bNV+hOHKZYoBjtYK0m0P+4Ve/1uHvlJWazXN w10EGpB/zlrq/Y1TW7QpRrxKWE8h/qBIDWiZQ8pnNyueK0Sf/F4fsF+MacPjEFH9mcke BCww== X-Received: by 10.49.48.44 with SMTP id i12mr23743qen.14.1369801824190; Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.99.1 with SMTP id em1ls61384qeb.61.gmail; Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.106.169 with SMTP id gv9mr25100qeb.7.1369801823121; Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 21:30:22 -0700 (PDT) From: ".iuROK." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Cc: yurock.tengo@gmail.com Message-Id: <14c665fd-c85e-4c05-be00-4398fd63d5c7@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] .e'o ko pe'u MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: yurock.tengo@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4429_30043707.1369801822035" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_4429_30043707.1369801822035 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 coi {ko} is used in Lojban where imperative mood would be used in other languages. The imperative mood is used to communicate: * commands; * requests; * permissions; * prohibitions; * advices; * maybe other things too. Of those uses, I think, commands and prohibitions assume listener's obligation to comply; others do not. In Lojban, using {ko} (or experimental {ko'oi}) is THE method of constructing "imperatives". For me, bare {ko broda} does not carry a connotation of listener's obligation or subordination; it can be a request, a permission, an advice, etc. A "connotation" MAY be conveyed by additional words: .i .ei dai ko klama .i ko sidju mi pe'u .i .e'a ko zutse .i .e'u ko sisku But default connotation should be unspecified. However, publications do not adree with my point of view. Lojban For Beginners suggests that bare {ko broda} is not polite in a typical situation: http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/lessons/less3soften.html CLL calls {ko}-sentences "commands": http://dag.github.io/cll/7/2/ So, what is your point of view? There are also words {.e'o} and {pe'u}. They are normally used in conjunction with {ko}. But what if they are used without {ko}? Is the resulting bridi a proposition or not? http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Irrealis+Attitudinals In this proposal {.e'o do dunda le silna mi} is translated as "Can you pass me the salt, please?", which suggests that {.e'o broda} is a request, NOT a proposition. (Also, that example uses {dunda} in a sense of "pass", "hand"; not "give a gift" as defined in the gusmu list.) I would prefer having only {ko} as the "magic word" that turns a bridi into a request. Then I would interpret {.e'o broda} as a "weak" proposition with a "connotation" of request. For example, consider a sign {le vi tanxe ku kunti .e'o}. Denotation: "this box should be empty". Connotation: "don't put stuff here". The same to {pe'u}. And what is your opinion on {.e'o broda}? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_4429_30043707.1369801822035 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable coi

{ko} is used in Lojban where imperative mood would be used in ot= her languages. The imperative mood is used to communicate:
* commands;* requests;
* permissions;
* prohibitions;
* advices;
* maybe= other things too.
Of those uses, I think, commands and prohibitions ass= ume listener's obligation to comply; others do not.

In Lojban, using= {ko} (or experimental {ko'oi}) is THE method of constructing "imperatives"= . For me, bare {ko broda} does not carry a connotation of listener's obliga= tion or subordination; it can be a request, a permission, an advice, etc. A= "connotation" MAY be conveyed by additional words:
.i .ei dai ko klama<= br>.i ko sidju mi pe'u
.i .e'a ko zutse
.i .e'u ko sisku
But defau= lt connotation should be unspecified.

However, publications do not a= dree with my point of view.
Lojban For Beginners suggests that bare {ko = broda} is not polite in a typical situation: http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudj= is/lojbanbrochure/lessons/less3soften.html
CLL calls {ko}-sentences "com= mands": http://dag.github.io/cll/7/2/

So, what is your point of view= ?

There are also words {.e'o} and {pe'u}. They are normally used in = conjunction with {ko}. But what if they are used without {ko}? Is the resul= ting bridi a proposition or not?

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Sec= tion%3A+Irrealis+Attitudinals
In this proposal {.e'o do dunda le silna m= i} is translated as "Can you pass me the salt, please?", which suggests tha= t {.e'o broda} is a request, NOT a proposition. (Also, that example uses {d= unda} in a sense of "pass", "hand"; not "give a gift" as defined in the gus= mu list.)

I would prefer having only {ko} as the "magic word" that t= urns a bridi into a request. Then I would interpret {.e'o broda} as a "weak= " proposition with a "connotation" of request. For example, consider a sign= {le vi tanxe ku kunti .e'o}.
Denotation: "this box should be empty".Connotation: "don't put stuff here".
The same to {pe'u}.

And wha= t is your opinion on {.e'o broda}?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_4429_30043707.1369801822035--