Received: from mail-ea0-f188.google.com ([209.85.215.188]:50130) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VN6Z5-0002hi-P7; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:37 -0700 Received: by mail-ea0-f188.google.com with SMTP id d10sf88431eaj.5 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=n3P5jnBTQ9CwdPpIcOn1v9qSpM1pnvDPxMLMeiOhRUo=; b=cBDqZfuvx0pDJ2MRZaHV0lvcSd8RXSDsoO1hHlT5tZvfCc2tUw/T4YPUlSUBFAphrs rvwNPPYB7WOV8qchaAXMoicM/zMDxwsvGYTL7HCLNAanPJlLhrHUQEXr8/lcZU9uUQAD iyasVwnBzq7R2/7WiJO3Ff/dqwYEPCoB5Z02wPctROPmSsp/AZ+f9yfghrHnJ/n/oNh3 VykLz3oHP48idFg0p2x/EiHoUO7+SqFFNvSi/7shbqUAJWCJBIf974uQVdLbLB1JZglJ mUsQFf31/KImJsOVVo1Tn9shpeF/FqQBMNW/d2A+w/2ReY+9GmyxSI4H4E7oujC+wPGn QVUA== X-Received: by 10.180.95.6 with SMTP id dg6mr185646wib.4.1379706024508; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.212.37 with SMTP id nh5ls190421wic.44.gmail; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.86.131 with SMTP id as3mr496658bkc.5.1379706023506; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5si1032827bkh.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.176; Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y6so893147lbh.7 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.37 with SMTP id kz5mr7290379lab.21.1379706008050; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.180.36 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:40:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:40:07 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] APE: Equivalent? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com, blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122814881234804e6d5d6f5 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e0122814881234804e6d5d6f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh, and yes, you did get the intent of this APE rather nicely, but the point was to get them to come to the answer through discussion, not be told it. I think learning by figuring it out is a much better way to learn than merely remembering things you're told. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > I'm sorry if I came on a little strong. I was a little irritated and > frustrated when I saw that you killed this before it even had a chance to > get going. I really like doing the APEs, and the only reason for my lack of > doing them (in a timely fashion) is the inability to think of good ones, > and you killed my pet. I mean, this was the first good idea I'd had since > /February/. I'm not angry at you or anything, more of a "le sigh" thing > going on. I have no idea how long it's going to take me to think of another > of these, especially since no one ever sends me ideas. (On that note, if > anyone does have any ideas for me, please send them directly to my email > and not via one of the groups. I'll give you credit for it unless you don't > want me to, I just don't want the audience to see them until I put out the > APE for it.) > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> .u'inai.o'o.i'enaicu'i.ienaicu'i.o'u.oisairo'e >>> >>> Your whole missive is completely not in the spirit of the APE. >>> >>> I mean, you did a whole huge Logician's analysis on the birdi apparently >>> before even /bothering/ with the rest of the message. >>> >>> Then instead of answering the questions by giving /_*examples*_/ like >>> was asked, you give another analysis, and what I would call a Philosopher's >>> Response to the third question.. Which, by the way, basically kills the >>> likelihood of the /audience/ /participating/, which, seeing as it's in the >>> acronym, is, you know, kind of the point. (Another point being that it's >>> for Beginner's. The reason it's on the Beginner's list.) >>> >>> And then you say you the format of this APE, which by the way is the >>> same the original set, is better, because chatters use IRC. APEs are not >>> and never were about "chatting". Obviously a chat room (IRC) is for >>> chatting, while a forum thread (Lojban, Lojban for Beginner's , etc.) is >>> for long-term discussion. I was asking about the category. The originals >>> were things like "Write a Lojban haiku, Write some Lojban proverbs, Write a >>> Lojban greeting that doesn't involve coi/co'o, i.e. translations of things >>> like "Good Morning!". >>> >>> P.S. I don't care if the terms I used to describe sections of your >>> missive are accurate, and I know they aren't technical. That's what (most) >>> everything you write looks like to me, and my opinion is my opinion. >>> Sometimes I agree with you, sometimes I don't, but that's neither here nor >>> there right now, and if you would like to debate with me my response, I am >>> willing in a new topic on main. >>> >> I was not trying to be dismissive. I like the question. I think it is >> very well motivated, and that answering it is very illuminating for any >> that don't already know the answer. Nevertheless I think such an answer >> exists, which makes it a "closed" question, perhaps more fitting for an >> interactive lesson than a fully open-ended activity. >> >> My reasoning is as follows. The difference between your first bridi and >> the {na} version of your second bridi is quite clean, I think, and in fact >> it is a nice example of the precision you can get with negation in Lojban. >> In English, while "he didn't tell the truth" doesn't necessarily imply that >> he told something that wasn't the truth, it so strongly suggests it that if >> you didn't mean that, you would probably need to specify this explicitly. I >> think Lojban, if not in the language then in its culture, tries to avoid >> such inherent biases to a significant extent, getting sharp distinctions >> like the one I described as a result. >> >> Sorry for screwing this up a bit. >> >> >> mi'e la latro'a mu'o >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e0122814881234804e6d5d6f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh, and yes, you did get the intent of this APE rather nic= ely, but the point was to get them to come to the answer through discussion= , not be told it. I think learning by figuring it out is a much better way = to learn than merely remembering things you're told.


On Fri,= Sep 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>= wrote:

I'm sorry if I came on a little strong. I was a little irritated an= d frustrated when I saw that you killed this before it even had a chance to= get going. I really like doing the APEs, and the only reason for my lack o= f doing them (in a timely fashion) is the inability to think of good ones, = and you killed my pet. I mean, this was the first good idea I'd had sin= ce /February/. I'm not angry at you or anything, more of a "le sig= h" thing going on. I have no idea how long it's going to take me t= o think of another of these, especially since no one ever sends me ideas. (= On that note, if anyone does have any ideas for me, please send them direct= ly to my email and not via one of the groups. I'll give you credit for = it unless you don't want me to, I just don't want the audience to s= ee them until I put out the APE for it.)

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Ian Johnson = <blindbravad= o@gmail.com> wrote:
=
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan = Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
.u'= inai.o'o.i'enaicu'i.ienaicu'i.o'u.oisairo'e

=
Your whole missive is completely not in the spirit of the APE.

I mean, you did a whole huge Logician's analysis on the birdi apparent= ly before even /bothering/ with the rest of the message.

Then instead of answering the questions by giving /_*examples*_/ = like was asked, you give another analysis, and what I would call a Philosop= her's Response to the third question.. Which, by the way, basically kil= ls the likelihood of the /audience/ /participating/, which, seeing as it= 9;s in the acronym, is, you know, kind of the point. (Another point being t= hat it's for Beginner's. The reason it's on the Beginner's = list.)

And t= hen you say you the format of this APE, which by the way is the same the or= iginal set, is better, because chatters use IRC. APEs are not and never wer= e about "chatting". Obviously a chat room (IRC) is for chatting, = while a forum thread (Lojban, Lojban for Beginner's , etc.) is for long= -term discussion. I was asking about the category. The originals were thing= s like "Write a Lojban haiku, Write some Lojban proverbs, Write a Lojb= an greeting that doesn't involve coi/co'o, i.e. translations of thi= ngs like "Good Morning!".

P.S. I don't care if the terms I u= sed to describe sections of your missive are accurate, and I know they aren= 't technical. That's what (most) everything you write looks like to= me, and my opinion is my opinion. Sometimes I agree with you, sometimes I = don't, but that's neither here nor there right now, and if you woul= d like to debate with me my response, I am willing in a new topic on main.<= br>
I was not trying to be dismissive. I li= ke the question. I think it is very well motivated, and that answering it i= s very illuminating for any that don't already know the answer. Neverth= eless I think such an answer exists, which makes it a "closed" qu= estion, perhaps more fitting for an interactive lesson than a fully open-en= ded activity.

My reasoning is as follows. The difference between your first bridi and= the {na} version of your second bridi is quite clean, I think, and in fact= it is a nice example of the precision you can get with negation in Lojban.= In English, while "he didn't tell the truth" doesn't nec= essarily imply that he told something that wasn't the truth, it so stro= ngly suggests it that if you didn't mean that, you would probably need = to specify this explicitly. I think Lojban, if not in the language then in = its culture, tries to avoid such inherent biases to a significant extent, g= etting sharp distinctions like the one I described as a result.

Sorry for screwing this up a bit.


mi'e la la= tro'a mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.=
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima= lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot = Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o mi'e .aion= ys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu= do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--089e0122814881234804e6d5d6f5--