Received: from mail-ve0-f189.google.com ([209.85.128.189]:46809) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbww0-0007cr-4X; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:39 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f189.google.com with SMTP id jz11sf658089veb.16 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/s2nbpuOnDIrcUnm9QXd5iPajkwhzTv7jJWkbu1PIjc=; b=xBbBUhYuSK4xKK0sOvMph59wZZEPSntvZge2PW5uEEWobAjfd7YvoHtk8b5O5NV7OB gzx6XysPp509GTg5nBZuR0V/gQ4Mi9bzqgf8vek4IrQjxWVSyj9PgaKT1Abh1/IN4NZJ mMUgvGXvhrNx037e7ZAXtOtt507hGo9sQwBmsDuk1s2fF/Zb7JdgvZzCMKY5u7j51cNf VWB6JYuXv9rIA7gTl8xMrHISmZ7TLsmMCEFPGc14VrNaThkPrVse0eaHQMC6QZlXFu3A AbRIvAAOo27jk1t/o2Q5BfXGupiJ70mPBUW+Mv0lm3dyZBfm+925m5iu/4Q99HFV9/4d MioQ== X-Received: by 10.49.37.132 with SMTP id y4mr49480qej.37.1383243925662; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.29.6 with SMTP id f6ls1045083qeh.3.gmail; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.26.6 with SMTP id h6mr91990qeg.23.1383243924674; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) From: iesk To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <64e7cd25-cdd9-46af-b396-dfce549aee2c@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Tanru-internal connectives, place structure, non-sense MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: pa.fae@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_923_8093222.1383243924163" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_923_8093222.1383243924163 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .i je zei .anste And again I am all of a sudden confused by the simplest Lojbanic=20 expressions. Help! I understand that, in a tanru of the form {[brodi] brode JA broda}, the=20 place structures of {broda} and {brode} are 'logically connected'. For=20 example, in {ti blanu je zdani} (CLL #12.12), {ti} fills the x1 place of=20 both {blanu} and {zdani}. =20 According to CLL, {ti blanu je zdani} means the same as {ti blanu gi'e=20 zdani} (#12.4) and {ti blanu .ije ti zdani} (#12.5). In all three cases,=20 the thing referred to by {ti} both 'blanu's and 'zdani's. In the above sentences, some sumti places are not filled. The ellipsis of= =20 sumti has no effect on the place structure; ellipsised sumti places are=20 understood as {zo'e}. For example, {mi tavla do zo'e zo'e} (CLL #5.5) means= =20 the same thing as {mi tavla do} (CLL #5.8)=20 Likewise, {ti blanu .ije ti zdani} is to be understood as {ti blanu .ije ti= =20 zdani zo'e}. And {ti blanu gi'e zdani} is equivalent to {ti blanu gi'e=20 zdani zo'e}. So far, so good. However, as for tanru-internal logical connection, {ti blanu je zdani=20 zo'e}, while syntactically correct, is semantically problematic, since=20 nobody knows what it means to {se blanu}: [1(2[zdani1 (home(s)) , blanu1=20 (blue thing(s)) :] ti this here)2 [is, does] =AB3(4blanu being blue je and= =20 zdani being home(s))4=BB3 (5[zdani2 (reside-r(s)) , blanu2 (blue??) :] zo'e= =20 unspecif it)5]1 (Jbofi'e, for illustration). So, is {ti blanu je zdani} (CLL #12.12) a meaningful sentence? To take another example: {sutra je jipci}. Does this express that there is= =20 a relation between an obvious x1, which is both quick and a chicken, and an= =20 obvious x2, which is both an event quickly brought about by x1 and the=20 chicken-breed of x1=97which does not make any sense? Does it mean anything? I'm afraid that I have probably been using sentences like {sutra je jipci}= =20 rather freely, and without bothering to think about any sumti but the x1. So, what's the solution? (An ellipsised {vau}? If so, then I'll have at=20 least one follow-up question.) ki'e do mu'o mi'e .iesk. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_923_8093222.1383243924163 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
.i je zei .anste

And again I am all of a sudden con= fused by the simplest Lojbanic expressions. Help!

I understand that,= in a tanru of the form {[brodi] brode JA broda}, the place structures of {= broda} and {brode} are 'logically connected'. For example, in {ti blanu je = zdani} (CLL #12.12), {ti} fills the x1 place of both {blanu} and {zdani}.&n= bsp;

According to CLL, {ti blanu je zdani} means the same as {ti bl= anu gi'e zdani} (#12.4) and {ti blanu .ije ti zdani} (#12.5). In all three = cases, the thing referred to by {ti} both 'blanu's and 'zdani's.

In = the above sentences, some sumti places are not filled. The ellipsis of sumt= i has no effect on the place structure; ellipsised sumti places are underst= ood as {zo'e}. For example, {mi tavla do zo'e zo'e} (CLL #5.5) means the sa= me thing as {mi tavla do} (CLL #5.8)

Likewise, {ti blanu .ije ti zd= ani} is to be understood as {ti blanu .ije ti zdani zo'e}. And {ti blanu gi= 'e zdani} is equivalent to {ti blanu gi'e zdani zo'e}.

So far, so go= od.

However, as for tanru-internal logical connection, {ti blanu je = zdani zo'e}, while syntactically correct, is semantically problematic, sinc= e nobody knows what it means to {se blanu}: [1(2[zdani1 (home(s)) , blanu1 = (blue thing(s)) :] ti this here)2 [is, does] =AB3(4blanu being blue je and = zdani being home(s))4=BB3 (5[zdani2 (reside-r(s)) , blanu2 (blue??) :] zo'e= unspecif it)5]1 (Jbofi'e, for illustration).

So, is {ti blanu je zd= ani} (CLL #12.12) a meaningful sentence?

To take another example: {s= utra je jipci}. Does this express that there is a relation between an obvio= us x1, which is both quick and a chicken, and an obvious x2, which is both = an event quickly brought about by x1 and the chicken-breed of x1=97which do= es not make any sense? Does it mean anything?

I'm afraid that I have= probably been using sentences like {sutra je jipci} rather freely, and wit= hout bothering to think about any sumti but the x1.

So, what's the s= olution? (An ellipsised {vau}? If so, then I'll have at least one follow-up= question.)

ki'e do mu'o mi'e .iesk.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_923_8093222.1383243924163--