Received: from mail-qc0-f188.google.com ([209.85.216.188]:39437) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1ViPZT-0006SW-5t; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:13:12 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f188.google.com with SMTP id t7sf708056qcv.5 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:12:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=oi216lU19bKz+RhNhwg4Cx8/XOkJW1MxUDYED6fGaQI=; b=qwZCXOLaWREKflre0i9Kt4dX7XQ4iH2lMHBG199ZTtLrCybJVoY066FI24pZlU2e1N L7IPOy6IiOBrVoNncrNfFtv2j4kF8RE2BL/AdgVfH8d7TnubDHCiBdlCRlkD4r7G6aV0 /s/n70UpYOoFM9zTDrun0V9T4qWdTWsC+DjJvraQWPV7UqcLJkdDcwnC63HZka04nYU3 jtGi+QsyjUikX2cLg9HnfkmuXWsVQBLiQjDQaC39C7GkN41xuM64AinkS/JK27eq7YM2 JvL4sOF7X1aF7jW2FdyMLe22riXXwXnNaTOySjdwhyCYS/fZpORjIVDbSresPLS3jgKv 0zBA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=oi216lU19bKz+RhNhwg4Cx8/XOkJW1MxUDYED6fGaQI=; b=Z1TE7BFri8R+WR7j52S8uCzc3hee4Hej76KJCEn6O2ZIMceXv0xHkXW6vnSNFRrdPP Ek5Hum6U9Y4AizZaJ+gmwBnRdWcC3l8EarenP8AEt0ddBwkFhCh07oleQleqFTMewHGu QpyfXufzOgphLCNr7UW7xpPM5ZtT4CSg+lVYr0AAmYTwBPHTeg6wzeiftYLGzdQWKwGC NMaXjS7lOdpFXFTxJCP9WLe2BvsxAwGTeN8/zGYWvWRgie758TAWaYYK1zz/qz4MrT7D fzTTYSoF13hpKu49U7mCUGPThdKRuijPxUIgwiThgsH8uiRWgUwGb4GQvDHBYjODQW3d jSRg== X-Received: by 10.49.81.162 with SMTP id b2mr1170qey.41.1384783961728; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:12:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.121.170 with SMTP id ll10ls2353159qeb.34.gmail; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:12:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.81.162 with SMTP id b2mr1167qey.41.1384783960890; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:12:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:12:40 -0800 (PST) From: la arxokuna To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Cc: geoffstewart56@gmail.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] la ciste lerfu be la ca. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_155_20002694.1384783960238" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_155_20002694.1384783960238 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know what was in mind of the author such an alphabet as Shavian. la srilermorna looks much sexier (and also see the description of it's=20 design ). On Monday, May 3, 2010 12:31:38 AM UTC+4, Geoffrey Stewart wrote: > > coi rodo > =20 > Recently I discovered something called the Shavian alphabet (or la ciste= =20 > lerfu be la ca., in my quick Lojban translation). It looks like something= =20 > that could be easily adapted for Lojban use, as it has already been adapt= ed=20 > for Esperanto use. Here is the wikipedia entry on it:=20 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shavian_alphabet > =20 > And here is a font (two, in fact): http://www.demeyere.com/shavian/ > =20 > Obviously the letters for /t=CA=83/ (c), /d=CA=92/ (J), and /=C5=8B/ (N) = would not be=20 > used. /j/ (j) and /w/ (w) would likewise not be used, as lojban uses=20 > vowels for that. /h/ (h) I am reluctant to use because it's so large and= =20 > the lojbanic <'> should be less intrusive, so possibly the apostrophe cou= ld=20 > just continue to be used. As for the vowels, A can be used for , e or = Efor ,=20 > I for , O for , M for , and a for .=20 > =20 > The main problem is that the mapping onto the keyboard doesn't seem to be= =20 > very intuitive for some of the symbols, and will have you reaching for th= e=20 > shift key more often than should be necessary. Nevertheless, it works fin= e=20 > with writing, and is a logical alphabet to go with a logical language. Te= ll=20 > me what you think! > =20 > mu'o mi'e djefris. > > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20 > lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit this group at=20 > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_155_20002694.1384783960238 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't know what was in mind of the author such an alphab= et as Shavian.
la srilermorna looks much sexier (and also see the descr= iption of it's design).



On Monday, May 3, 2010 1= 2:31:38 AM UTC+4, Geoffrey Stewart wrote:
coi rodo
 
Recently I discovered something called the Shavian alphabet (or la cis= te lerfu be la ca., in my quick Lojban translation). It looks like somethin= g that could be easily adapted for Lojban use, as it has already been adapt= ed for Esperanto use. Here is the wikipedia entry on it: http://en.wikiped= ia.org/wiki/Shavian_alphabet
 
And here is a font (two, in fact): http://www.demeyere.com/shavian/
 
Obviously the letters for
 
The main problem is that the mapping onto the keyboard doesn't seem = to be very intuitive for some of the symbols, and will have you reaching fo= r the shift key more often than should be necessary. Nevertheless, it works= fine with writing, and is a logical alphabet to go with a logical language= . Tell me what you think!
 
mu'o mi'e djefris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_155_20002694.1384783960238--
/t=CA=83/ (c), /d=CA=92/ (J), and /=C5=8B/ (N) would not be used. /j/ (j) and /w/ (w) would likewise not be used, as lojban uses vowels for that. /h/ (h) = ;I am reluctant to use because it's so large and the lojbanic <'> sho= uld be less intrusive, so possibly the apostrophe could just continue to be= used. As for the vowels, A can be used for <a>, e&= nbsp;or E for <e>, I<= /span> for <i>, O for <o>, M f= or <u>, and a= for <y>.