Received: from mail-ie0-f191.google.com ([209.85.223.191]:46372) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1W1I0Z-0002gs-9L for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:59:16 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f191.google.com with SMTP id e14sf716165iej.8 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=CP9qwOinDq+S1rZAlDURD3a+aNnZf+YIVW4CqIfJ42E=; b=fXiZWF9iEBMQjCFxp/BiOFRZ6kLt/fbmSXCX6zFhGpotB2moifbdEyn9HcSxxQoC+3 Ip87nb96TPAFPcHbi6yQtlWQSntqJYGCSHrcfKFJ/BMrggYIWVJv9aTRxbSrL30dyv2G F28zQbQ0SVuw5YJ+xyC2mtGyiz6YmOPlRdH0+RVcpH9rGslgKRr/VLohESWX91PTF34C +/ANB2Cbel4Jpj8JsllvJhc7dgT38I+sc8YuIbZuch7XciO6oIii5cUUcuRIF5L5HRXR qQeyZb2ZsiQCKNzetUjmLdO9oXPo4O6i4J+JBOLG9Jhfa70o95ldkX7W8x9sA76RRZk7 raEw== X-Received: by 10.49.122.42 with SMTP id lp10mr74567qeb.17.1389283133162; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:53 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.58.229 with SMTP id u5ls1065641qeq.69.gmail; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.149.198 with SMTP id x46mr1361069yhj.7.1389283131851; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v64si1466307yhm.3.2014.01.09.07.58.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c; Received: by mail-ie0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u16so3030367iet.17 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.81.7 with SMTP id x7mr1274089ick.84.1389283131656; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.223.166 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3b2eb236-ffa9-48b6-922e-6008ab83553d@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:58:51 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Connectives & time From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303347c18e16a504ef8bafc1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf303347c18e16a504ef8bafc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 9 January 2014 07:18, Sebastian wrote: > Don't you think that {mi ze'e pu prami do} could mean either {mi ze'e pu > su'oroi prami do} (="I have always loved you at least one time") or {mi > ze'e pu roroi prami do} (="I have always loved you at every time" (whatever > "times" refers to here)) or {mi ze'e pu ru'i prami do} (="I have always > loved you continuously") etc? > In most contexts I think the latter is the most plausible interpretation of > bare {ze'e pu}, don't you think? > I don't think plain {ze'e pu} implies anything in between. {ze'e [PU] PA roi} is a different thing. Per CLL 10.9, it is a compound tense, where the {ze'e} specifies the time over which the counting occurs, right? I would translate {mi ze'e pu su'o roi prami do} as "I loved you at least once in the past". The {ru'i} is as plausible as it would be without the {ze'e}. See also http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+Distance > {mi roroi prami do} could for example means {mi pu ze'u roroi ca ze'i pu > prami do} (="there was a time in the past when I at every occasion had > loved you for a short time"). > Yes, it could. mu'o mi'e .asiz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --20cf303347c18e16a504ef8bafc1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 9 January 2014 07:18, Sebastian <so.cool.ogi@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
Do= n't you think that {mi ze'e pu prami do} could mean either {mi ze&#= 39;e pu su'oroi prami do} (=3D"I have always loved you at least on= e time") or {mi ze'e pu roroi prami do} (=3D"I have always lo= ved you at every time" (whatever "times" refers to here)) or= {mi ze'e pu ru'i prami do} (=3D"I have always loved you conti= nuously") etc?
In most contexts I think the latter is the most plausible = interpretation of bare {ze'e pu}, don't you think?

I don't think plain {ze'e pu} implies anything in between. {ze'e= [PU] PA=20 roi} is a different thing. Per CLL 10.9, it is a compound tense, where the = {ze'e} specifies the time over which the counting occurs, right? I woul= d translate {mi ze'e pu su'o roi prami do} as "I loved you at = least once in the past".

The {ru'i} is as plausible as it would be without the {ze'e}.

See also http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+Distance
=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
{mi roroi prami do} could for example means {mi pu z= e'u roroi ca ze'i pu prami do} (=3D"there was a time in the pa= st when I at every occasion had loved you for a short time").

Yes, it could.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz
<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--20cf303347c18e16a504ef8bafc1--