Received: from mail-qc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.216.191]:59476) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wfw4J-0001tW-Dc for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 11:51:03 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f191.google.com with SMTP id r5sf715953qcx.8 for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dvaGQMHqgwc716MZkRFex8LCcIafbbaAyzr/DZN4N7g=; b=sEqOVR3e2DxfVJ4NSikOnjoZhJNn/SBpRJEpo7lzlEVBRcKvFMWkrmnLpTHKkeBMCr K1SjQPnOT2BUbekKNz8dzBXbIbPjMkyEicuNbhQ7b4L/h6cCdK8yafkEpH0r7GXtFGwr t9LU6dK0ZIsd5AKJBwPviN2Caub7I1Zfi9xKmD+c2kkYyC1ozCpWov7TThd+gqZ7ilVG egmzOTz+wU95zDHggW2UKsAYOxlg3xlX6te/w5CMiErV0zg49HkEKqBAw5uDsRM4LWp9 LgTNmZTJp0X3qYpAaYugI2cricMt4U4RCtt2OhN54PX+F+yuIzFTUXxCtEigfOAxur0g PAJQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dvaGQMHqgwc716MZkRFex8LCcIafbbaAyzr/DZN4N7g=; b=UmQDPL3Zarv1R901fnWU3RTE6r89GdKs0jLvbeXarfh4sJZH4XL2V9z0CGhl7gO5L/ 5xLmO0+hwAlmtttYmahmk0dGcPMHM/NIkzHmRdMU8oCqpyaslFYvbLAAVOpHPbp5zugN wMTbm/PTx7cEYFxA9zz515rEF96MqkJMyZ80LW5/F1yvuh/qpVvLN/G4l2a5JZ6QEKZC Ry4gt2RAQYc5GT4SfiWkQVSs8MQoOnJOeICb/YZ2/ywLAfkNBxcgUDuacKvyqPrqbypR MBPxZy8o9DyPRtXv3XfI4mDWTGL48PyztrwZfqD8WHkyY0Q8v5hJIqK2z25vC1cXwR0/ Dm0w== X-Received: by 10.182.22.138 with SMTP id d10mr86524obf.7.1398970245214; Thu, 01 May 2014 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.181.7 with SMTP id ds7ls667905obc.77.gmail; Thu, 01 May 2014 11:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.191.68 with SMTP id gw4mr94427obc.15.1398970243960; Thu, 01 May 2014 11:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:50:43 -0700 (PDT) From: ".neit." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: Subject: [lojban-beginners] {lo ka "attitudinal"} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kosmikconundrum@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_83_15322288.1398970243025" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_83_15322288.1398970243025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 coi rodo .uanai .e'o So if I wanted to say {mi ca tarti lo ka _attitudinal_ kei} Would that be gramatical? Would the {ce'u} necessarily implied by the {ka} be the speaker since all attitudinals are spoken from the perspective of the speaker? (excepting for {dai} of course). Or would there be no {ce'u} since {ce'u} is a sumka'i and needs a sumti place to occupy (and attitudinals have no sumti places)? I ask because with the attitudinals, their scales, modifiers, categories and sheer compoundability, a speaker could articulate to a higher degree, his/her feelings than simply using brivla. And given that, there are times when you would want to express a feeling in bridi form, which brivla fail to adequately specify. I'm trying to get at a way of discussing an attitudinal compound in a bridi. Could I assign the attitudinal compound to an assignable sumka'i using {goi} and discuss the attitudinal compound using that sumka'i? ki'e da do mi'e .neit. mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_83_15322288.1398970243025 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
coi rodo
 
.uanai .e'o So if I wanted to say {mi ca tarti lo ka _attitudinal= _ kei}  Would that be gramatical?  Would the {ce'u} necessarily i= mplied by the {ka} be the speaker since all attitudinals are spoken from th= e perspective of the speaker?  (excepting for {dai} of course).  = Or would there be no {ce'u} since {ce'u} is a sumka'i and needs a sumti pla= ce to occupy (and attitudinals have no sumti places)?
 
I ask because with the attitudinals, their scales, modifiers, categori= es and sheer compoundability, a speaker could articulate to a higher degree= , his/her feelings than simply using brivla.  And given that, there ar= e times when you would want to express a feeling in bridi form, which brivl= a fail to adequately specify.  I'm trying to get at a way of discussin= g an attitudinal compound in a bridi. 
 
Could I assign the attitudinal compound to an assignable sumka'i using= {goi} and discuss the attitudinal compound using that sumka'i? 
 
ki'e da do
 
mi'e .neit. mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_83_15322288.1398970243025--