Received: from mail-lb0-f186.google.com ([209.85.217.186]:33933) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAdzo-0006T8-VC for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:43 -0700 Received: by lbwj1 with SMTP id j1sf6374148lbw.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kYgXeZFdigkXtzyZghWbLRKa0BSwAC7TgeiBMRUvM6w=; b=hHbgvYjKvjLmwZBEHmLXaChKRhNypwK2TUsqvrfRcliq0B92OoKTQvdxKyH7Xmiprd tkVtpJ3O4qF5DE9pRn8awhqhbqFUmf5LV7JhH1zY61GavLVGeTdGNoNeBXm7WMwITjJw WPaK6k33WF/UQt1bEmn57HwL8F1v8ErJfhvpVpPg91okIKjKVhdLb3oAWzEZcmuKrXww 3GaxpgAHCnSLEFD7OEomwKf+IB3R0ekkLAVvEmXxptQldWbcHcZUvBPAfTvdla8Xi1MH Rf3Ot5Kxsf2Ss9ICwej0rb7g9qqMf7BtA+7rwbceXFnCNuwz/6nZirCkpmvy6G0mDwGP uo2Q== X-Received: by 10.152.120.5 with SMTP id ky5mr338304lab.21.1435841614279; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.20.10 with SMTP id j10ls353424lae.6.gmail; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.118.194 with SMTP id ko2mr17187248lbb.16.1435841613081; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p9si945970wiz.3.2015.07.02.05.53.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::233; Received: by mail-wi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id gi11so72663133wic.0 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.86.161 with SMTP id q1mr37372953wjz.18.1435841612908; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (95-210-220-56.ip.skylogicnet.com. [95.210.220.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gw7sm27190904wib.15.2015.07.02.05.53.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55953442.8050709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:53:22 +0200 From: Ilmen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Text for a piece of music References: <4502e6dd-3a5d-4596-a637-cdc07030d678@googlegroups.com> <1844540.PG0NdlNGt2@caracal> <7b1aeda5-e46c-4f50-9ee6-c5fc58768d62@googlegroups.com> <1516537.7dOU9lx3EX@caracal> <3a642760-e3e8-445d-a4b4-ce8aec56ac85@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <3a642760-e3e8-445d-a4b4-ce8aec56ac85@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060203060009000904030508" X-Original-Sender: ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060203060009000904030508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/07/2015 14:20, Erik Natanael Gustafsson wrote: > > That means "all the birds join in the same [as something else] > song". If you > mean "same [as each other]", you can say "mitsi'u", or reword it, > "ro loi > cipni cu mitsi'u lo ka ce'u sanga makau". > > Ahh, good. I'll simply change it to mitsi'u then. Out of curiosity,=20 > could one shorten your alternative to "ro loi cipni cu mitsi'u lo ka=20 > sanga" having the other places implicit without losing to much meaning? I would say {lo ro cipni cu dunsi'u lo ka sanga}, here. I don't think=20 {ro loi cipni cu simxu...} is correct here, because this {ro} makes it=20 distributive, whereas {simxu} expects a plurality of individuals. As a side note, you can move around the sentence elements for achieving=20 better rhymes. > > > .i loi melbi selpeisku po do cu rivli'a se ka'a lo sasfoi .ijebo > mi'o bajra > > gi'e farlu gi'e sa'irbi'o je refcfa bajra .i mi'o bajra mu'i lo > ricfoi > > .ijebo mi'o bajra mu'i lo ka ro da na'e claxu lo selfi'a > > "sa'irbi'o je refcfa" modifies "bajra". I'm not sure that's what > you mean. > > Ahh, okay. No, the reason I didn't use gi'e between "sa'irbi'o" and=20 > "refcfa bajra" was that I wanted to group them more together than with=20 > the previous selbri, but perhaps that isn't necessary. Changing je to=20 > gi'e would fix it right? Is there another way of grouping selbri=20 > without creating tanru? Tighter grouping is achieved with {bo}. For example, {brode gi'e bo=20 brodo}. You can also opt for {gi'e ba bo}, which means "and then=E2=80=A6" = (gi'e=20 in itself has no implication of temporal sequence, although a temporal=20 sequence may be deduced from context; for making a temporal sequence of=20 events explicit, you can use {gi'e ba bo}). By the way, {selpeisku} is undefined. Why not using simply {se peisku},=20 or {se pensi}? Also, using {po} there is a little weird (if I'm not=20 mistaken, {po} is for social/legal possessions). {lo se peisku pe do} or=20 {lo se peisku be do} would fit better I think. ({be} is for if {do} is=20 the one who thinks the thought we're talking about; {pe} is for if the=20 thought are related to {do}, without specifying if {do} is the one who=20 think them). mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --------------060203060009000904030508 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 02/07/2015 14:20, Erik Natanael Gustafsson wrote:
That means "all the birds join in the same [as something else] song". If you
mean "same [as each other]", you can say "mitsi'u", or reword it, "ro loi
cipni cu mitsi'u lo ka ce'u sanga makau".
Ahh, good. I'll simply change it to mitsi'u then. Out of curiosity, could one shorten your alternative to "ro loi cipni cu mitsi'u lo ka sanga" having the other places implicit without losing to much meaning?
I would say {lo ro cipni cu dunsi'u lo ka sanga}, here. I don't think {ro loi cipni cu simxu...} is correct here, because this {ro} makes it distributive, whereas {simxu} expects a plurality of individuals.

As a side note, you can move around the sentence elements for achieving better rhymes.


> .i loi melbi selpeisku po do cu rivli'a se ka'a lo sasfoi .ijebo mi'o bajra
> gi'e farlu gi'e sa'irbi'o je refcfa bajra .i mi'o bajra mu'i lo ricfoi
> .ijebo mi'o bajra mu'i lo ka ro da na'e claxu lo selfi'a

"sa'irbi'o je refcfa" modifies "bajra". I'm not sure that's what you mean.
Ahh, okay. No, the reason I didn't use gi'e between "sa'irbi'o" and "refcfa bajra" was that I wanted to group them more together than with the previous selbri, but perhaps that isn't necessary. Changing je to gi'e would fix it right? Is there another way of grouping selbri without creating tanru?

Tighter grouping is achieved with {bo}. For example, {brode gi'e bo brodo}. You can also opt for {gi'e ba bo}, which means "and then=E2=80= =A6" (gi'e in itself has no implication of temporal sequence, although a temporal sequence may be deduced from context; for making a temporal sequence of events explicit, you can use {gi'e ba bo}).

By the way, {selpeisku} is undefined. Why not using simply {se peisku}, or {se pensi}? Also, using {po} there is a little weird (if I'm not mistaken, {po} is for social/legal possessions). {lo se peisku pe do} or {lo se peisku be do} would fit better I think. ({be} is for if {do} is the one who thinks the thought we're talking about; {pe} is for if the thought are related to {do}, without specifying if {do} is the one who think them).

mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--------------060203060009000904030508--