Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::231;
Message-ID: <559A7FCA.4010801@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:16:58 +0200
From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Text for a piece of music
References: <4502e6dd-3a5d-4596-a637-cdc07030d678@googlegroups.com> <1844540.PG0NdlNGt2@caracal> <7b1aeda5-e46c-4f50-9ee6-c5fc58768d62@googlegroups.com> <1516537.7dOU9lx3EX@caracal> <3a642760-e3e8-445d-a4b4-ce8aec56ac85@googlegroups.com> <55953442.8050709@gmail.com> <85a4ad84-61dc-4089-967e-9e1f29dc93b3@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <85a4ad84-61dc-4089-967e-9e1f29dc93b3@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000201060707090204080901"
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -3.0
X-Spam_score_int: -29
X-Spam_bar: ---

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000201060707090204080901
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed


On 02/07/2015 21:14, Erik Natanael Gustafsson wrote:
> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 2:53:34 PM UTC+2, Ilmen wrote:
>
>     I would say {lo ro cipni cu dunsi'u lo ka sanga}, here. I don't
>     think {ro loi cipni cu simxu...} is correct here, because this
>     {ro} makes it distributive, whereas {simxu} expects a plurality of
>     individuals.
>
> What is the difference between dunsi'u and mitsi'u? You are right, 
> they should be treated as individuals. It fits better with the context 
> as well.

In my understanding:
{dunsi'u} = "x1 (plural) are mutually equal in what they are in relation 
x2 with".
For example, {mi'o dunsi'u lo ka (ce'u) nelci (ce'u/makau)} = "We 
(you+me) like the same things", "We are equal in what we like".

As for {mitsi'u}, it sounds like "everything among x1 is the same 
thing/individual", "x1 (plural) are one individual", or something like 
that. But I think other people would disagree with this interpretation.

mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--------------000201060707090204080901
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/07/2015 21:14, Erik Natanael
      Gustafsson wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:85a4ad84-61dc-4089-967e-9e1f29dc93b3@googlegroups.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 2:53:34 PM UTC+2,
        Ilmen wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left:
          0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">I would say {lo ro cipni
            cu dunsi'u lo ka sanga}, here. I don't think {ro loi cipni
            cu simxu...} is correct here, because this {ro} makes it
            distributive, whereas {simxu} expects a plurality of
            individuals.<br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div>What is the difference between dunsi'u and mitsi'u? You are
          right, they should be treated as individuals. It fits better
          with the context as well. <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    In my understanding:<br>
    {dunsi'u} = "x1 (plural) are mutually equal in what they are in
    relation x2 with".<br>
    For example, {mi'o dunsi'u lo ka (ce'u) nelci (ce'u/makau)} = "We
    (you+me) like the same things", "We are equal in what we like".<br>
    <br>
    As for {mitsi'u}, it sounds like "everything among x1 is the same
    thing/individual", "x1 (plural) are one individual", or something
    like that. But I think other people would disagree with this
    interpretation.<br>
    <br>
    mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o<br>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;Lojban Beginners&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com">lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--------------000201060707090204080901--