Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wow.jvs@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c09::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c09::233;
From: mezohe <wow.jvs@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5787F997.1050508@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:44:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Is it possible to use be directly followed by bei?
References: <ceb39847-a6fd-e816-2a94-ae21af60f3d9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ceb39847-a6fd-e816-2a94-ae21af60f3d9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

2016-07-14 18:24 0x90:
> Is it possible to use be directly followed by bei, indicating that the
> sumti followed by be is omitted(=zo'e)? I know it is possible to do the
> same with "be fi", but I think it sounds better. I think it should be
> possible since the bei makes it obvious that the one between be and bai
> was elided... However, no of the parsers I tried accepted this.
>

Officially it isn't possible, but someone else proposed the same thing a 
few years ago, and there's an experimental parser that accepts it:

http://lojban.github.io/ilmentufa/camxes-exp.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.