From hokstein@free.elogica.com.br Thu Feb 13 19:04:52 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:06:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [200.185.56.14] (helo=br.inter.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18jW9i-0003oQ-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:04:51 -0800 Received: from 141099.telemar.net.br ([200.165.141.99] helo=oliveira) by br.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18jVyV-00037K-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:53:15 -0200 Message-ID: <00eb01c2d3d5$d4f3d6c0$15180aac@oliveira> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ricardo_Oliveira?= To: References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030213022637.0333e250@pop.east.cox.net> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Loglan Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:01:22 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C2D3BC.35B28700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-archive-position: 115 X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: hokstein@free.elogica.com.br Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C2D3BC.35B28700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert, Thanks for your reply! I consider my question answered now. :-) Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Robert LeChevalier=20 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org=20 Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:58 AM Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Loglan At 11:59 PM 2/11/03 -0300, Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira wrote: >The FAQ does adresses the question, but it gives almost no = information as=20 >to why the two groups split up. Did they disagree about some Loglan=20 >feature? Was it about the way the Loglan Institute was being run? A very old (and in need of some revision) response to this can be = found on=20 the Web site at http://www.lojban.org/files/brochures/loglan.html ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C2D3BC.35B28700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Robert,
 
Thanks for your reply! I consider my question answered now. = :-)
 
Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Robert=20 LeChevalier
To: lojban-beginner= s@chain.digitalkingdom.org=20
Sent: Thursday, February 13, = 2003 4:58=20 AM
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: = Loglan

At 11:59 PM 2/11/03 -0300, Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira=20 wrote:
>The FAQ does adresses the question, but it gives almost = no=20 information as
>to why the two groups split up. Did they = disagree about=20 some Loglan
>feature? Was it about the way the Loglan Institute = was=20 being run?

A very old (and in need of some revision) response = to this=20 can be found on
the Web site at
http://www.loj= ban.org/files/brochures/loglan.html

<SNIP><= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01C2D3BC.35B28700--