From pnewton@gmx.de Fri Feb 28 06:21:34 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.87]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18olOI-0003jL-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:21:34 -0800 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor-online.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h1SELUJl078903 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:21:31 +0100 (CET) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:19:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban-beginners] sumti before and after "composite" selbri Message-ID: <3E5F7E1F.13918.E36E50@localhost> Priority: normal Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 191 X-Approved-By: pnewton@gmx.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Is {la stelas. mi xendo gi'e prami} the same as {la stelas. xendo gi'e prami mi}? (It appears not; in the first case, {mi} is x2 of both {xendo} and {prami}, in the second only of {prami}.) Is {la stelas. mi xendo je prami} the same as {la stelas. xendo je prami mi}? (It appears so -- that {mi} is x2 of both {xendo} and {prami}, regardless of the order.) What is the difference between the sentence with {gi'e} and the sentence with {je}? What are the forethought versions? Is it {la stelas mi ge xendo gi prami} for the version with {gi'e} and {la stelas mi gu'e xendo gi prami} for the version with {je}? mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton