From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Thu Feb 06 03:41:20 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 06 Feb 2003 03:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12] helo=spree.gedas.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18gkP9-0005gn-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 03:41:19 -0800 Received: from spree.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22291 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:41:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22287 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:41:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:40:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Intonation of xu (was Re: (no subject)) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:41:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-archive-position: 70 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Theodore Reed wrote: > > > .i.e'u ko troci tu'a la jbofi'e .i.o'acu'i mi ta'e pilno > > > ri lepu'u cipra pu mi gubyternoi > > Am I the only one that noticed his usage of "ri"? Doesn't > "ri" mean the last sumti? ie "mi pilno ri" would be "I use myself". I noticed, but since I'm not sure about the "back-counting rules" that ri uses to determine the referent, I didn't comment on it. mu'omi'e filip. -- filip.niutyn. All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.