From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon Mar 08 05:27:05 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B0Kmf-0005fO-5V for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:27:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20040308132631.51512.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:26:31 PST Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 05:26:31 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Feedback on phrases To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org In-Reply-To: <20040308004413.K8729@fresco.Math.McGill.CA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 582 X-Approved-By: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners --- Andrew Archibald wrote: > Not that this is > trivial: {lo vofli xarju cu ma} is a question making a rather dubious > statement. That should be {mo} instead of {ma}. >Can it be answered with Hofstadter's "unask that > question!"? Is {na} sufficient? {na'i} is used to indicate that the presuppositions are wrong. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com