From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 23 14:47:59 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzMfX-0003Xb-Hm for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:47:59 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:47:59 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: logical proofs? Message-ID: <20040823214759.GE3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <1093232310.412966b640996@www.gulik.co.nz> <20040823041958.GD3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040823031849.A32026@fresco.Math.McGill.CA> <20040823153053.GI3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <1093296583.412a61c7e09ce@www.gulik.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1093296583.412a61c7e09ce@www.gulik.co.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 729 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:29:43AM +1200, mikevdg@gulik.co.nz wrote: > (a proof that the set of prime numbers has infinitely many members...) > > Quoting Robin Lee Powell : > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 03:18:49AM -0400, Andrew Archibald wrote: > > ni'o jarco lo du'u ci'i mulna'usle cei broda cu zasti > > .i sruma lo du'u mi'o ponse lo liste be me'i ci'i broda > > .i ba bo finti ko'a goi lo namcu poi ve jmina li pa lo simxu pilji be ro > > le se liste > > .i ko'a to se nibli lo pu nu jarco toi cu kakne lo nu fendi fi pa > > broda goi ko'e to cumki lo nu du ko'a toi > > .i ku'i ko'e na se fendi fi lo se liste broda .i se ni'i bo su'o broda > > poi na se list cu zasti to cumki lo nu na du ko'a toi > > .i se ni'i bo lo liste be me'i ci'i broda cu na kakne lo nu vasru ro > > broda > > .i fe'o > > *phew*. Yea, okay, I'm convinced. Has somebody put a revised version > of this on the wiki? No, but I suppose somebody could. :-) That's your cue. > It's all pretty much gibberish to me though. Not surprised. > What I'm interested in is whether it is possible that this could be > mechanically derived, for example by somebody using a proof assistant > such as COQ, but using lojban? I.e are all the steps in the proof > mechanical enough to convince a computer that (e.g.) prime numbers are > infinite? Rob Speer is working on something like this. Rob? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"