From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 28 12:27:03 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C18qs-00050V-Tm for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:27:03 -0700 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:27:02 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Check pronunciation, please? Message-ID: <20040828192702.GJ26123@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20040826220700.GO26123@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <78E49009-F8FC-11D8-A6FC-000A9589294C@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78E49009-F8FC-11D8-A6FC-000A9589294C@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 768 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 10:13:45AM -0400, John Johnson wrote: > That's not to far off. I think it was: > > mi viska la n'ebo le gerka Well, that should be "na'e" for one thing. For another, it doesn't parse, and for a third, there is no word "gerka". Perhaps you wanted: mi viska na'e bo le gerku I see something other than the dog. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"