From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Oct 13 12:53:53 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CHpC5-0004eq-1m for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:53 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: cmavo can be selbri? Message-ID: <20041013195353.GL12568@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20041013184100.89935.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041013184100.89935.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 820 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:41:00AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > (And what about {mintu}?) As far as *I* can tell, le smuni be zo mintu cu mintu le smuni be zo dunli so'a da Up until today, I wasn't convinced of that, but I am now. The only difference is that {dunli fi mi} would be strange, but {mintu fi mi} would not, and vice versa for {mintu fi lo ka xunri} and {dunli fi lo ka xunre}. Neither of them is {du}. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"