From pubsynx7hye@pacbell.net Sat Nov 13 01:05:15 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:11:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.60] helo=ylpvm29.prodigy.net)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CStqM-0005VK-Nq
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:05:15 -0800
Received: from synx.dyndns.org (adsl-63-197-122-98.dsl.sktn01.pacbell.net [63.197.122.98])
	by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAD952DU025416
	for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 04:05:02 -0500
Received: by synx.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A995B11FA36; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:05:04 -0800 (PST)
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] What is lojban for validity/invalidity?
X-Draft-From: ("INBOX.lists.lojban")
From: Starling <pubsynx7hye@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:05:04 -0800
Message-ID: <87lld65dbz.fsf@pacbell.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 873
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: pubsynx7hye@pacbell.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

I want to do no more than claim that a famous phrase in Latin is
invalid, in lojban.  :3  By invalid I mean it does not apply to the
situation, and/or it cannot be accepted as true or axiomatic.

Is there a gismu Q whose bridi goes x1 is-invalid because-of x2 or
something along those lines?