From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Dec 22 11:53:56 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ChCYW-00025a-3C for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:53:56 -0800 Received: (qmail 36747 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Dec 2004 19:53:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20041222195324.36744.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:53:24 PST Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:53:24 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ko ba cu gleki ca'o le citsi To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org In-Reply-To: <20041222190114.GQ20429@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 968 X-Approved-By: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:35:56PM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > > > Is {le citsi} just acting as a modifier of the {ca'o} tense, > > Other way around: ca'o modifies (tags, actually) le cisti. I think it is correct to say that {le citsi} modifies the tense. Tags always modify the whole bridi. Tag complements (i.e. the "tagged sumti") are really further specifiers of the tag, providing a reference point or some other additional info for the tag. (This is one way of viewing it anyway.) mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail