From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 17 09:58:13 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cqb8n-0007wP-6h for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:58:13 -0800 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:58:13 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Everyone should speak lojban? Message-ID: <20050117175813.GS10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <41E86B09.7010004@pacbell.net> <3E9364E6-66E3-11D9-B104-000D9329C984@online.fr> <41EAEF88.5090407@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41EAEF88.5090407@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 1027 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:49:44PM -0800, Tasci wrote: > cmavo always confuse me because of their priveleged status outside > of any kind of restrictive grammar. Umm, what? "mi ke co" is quite illegal. Those are all cmavo. Perhaps you had a particular sub-set of cmavo in mind. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/