From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jan 25 12:47:03 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CtXaZ-00024U-B6 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:47:03 -0800 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:47:03 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Love Message-ID: <20050125204703.GL2342@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 1050 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:32:39PM -0400, Betsemes wrote: [snip prami def'n] > Now I have a question, in both entries it's specified that x2 > takes an object or a state in the first definition. The remaining > ones do not specify what kind of argument it takes. So I cannot > decide if I can or cannot put a person at x2. Could you clarify? A person is an object, so yes, feel free. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/