From bgeron@gmail.com Wed Jan 26 11:40:25 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:42:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ctt1d-0003PQ-CT for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:40:25 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so5869rne for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:39:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=YZ3WaBdG7gj4jiOSIXaVYjTm66fC3VhdWyrwLbQDgOD/jRgVzy1ZbT9Jvzi61x+4B8NNg1KtXM/5CxZ3PhHcBHnIQAvUEJDbfC13Pp6oZxJI8SXZ0PGAUWLvQUA99tAdGBG0WVktwpZidoR0VLFTz/Pxv9h8zzSE+G4aQ/D02wc= Received: by 10.38.102.15 with SMTP id z15mr50470rnb; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.12? ([81.204.154.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 59sm32547rnb.2005.01.26.11.39.53; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:39:54 -0800 (PST) To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Single numbers as years Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:39:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501262039.48822.bgeron@planet.nl> From: Bram Geron X-archive-position: 1060 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: bgeron@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Wednesday 26 January 2005 14:31, Betsemes wrote: > In chapter 5 of Lojban for Beginners, this comment is written: > "More recently there has been a proposal to make single numbers refer by > default to year rather than day; the controversy on this has not settled > down yet." > > This refers to the construct expressed as "li " which in case of > dates refers to the day of month. I guess that this proposal could have > some time of having been proposed so I want to know what have been decided > about this if anything. (If my opinion counts and it maybe doesn't; I don't > like those irregularities in programming languages, much worse is the case > in human languages. I prefer to use cmene for years). You could use nanca, but you haven't learned how to use it. Keep on learning.