From mail@raphael.poss.name Wed Jan 26 12:03:30 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from a.mx.zettai.net ([207.58.154.6]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1CttNx-0004Vj-Tg for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:03:30 -0800 Received: (qmail 58881 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2005 20:03:28 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.0.8 ppid: 58848, pid: 58872, t: 0.4001s scanners: clamav: 0.80/m:28/d:625 spam: 3.0.1 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.9?) (mail@raphael.poss.name@213.41.129.7) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 20:03:27 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <20050126194917.GW20235@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20050126194917.GW20235@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--386417094" Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Poss?= Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Single numbers as years Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:03:21 +0100 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on beta.zettai.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-archive-position: 1067 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: mail@raphael.poss.name Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners --Apple-Mail-2--386417094 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Le 26 janv. 05, =E0 20:49, Robin Lee Powell a =E9crit : > pa pi'e re pi'e pa ki'o > -- "the first of February of 2000" > pa ki'o > -- "the year 2000" > pa ki'o pi'e ci > -- "March of the year 2000" > pa ki'o pi'e ci pi'e vo > -- "the 4th of March of the year 2000" > s/pa ki'o/re ki'o/ (it's 2000 not 1000) Hence: pa pi'e re pi'e re ki'o re ki'o re ki'o pi'e ci re ki'o pi'e ci pi'e vo > >> (If my opinion counts and it maybe doesn't; I don't like >> those irregularities in programming languages, much worse is the >> case in human languages. I prefer to use cmene for years). > > Umm, huh? How would you use cmene for years, exactly? "panononos"? > renononos ? Hmm, let's see... {mi ba cliva ca la reki'on} ... why not. But it isn't much different than {mi ba cliva ca li reki'o}. --=20 Rapha=EBl --Apple-Mail-2--386417094 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?= content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFB9/eN18ht0zty5ysRAlI5AKC5HDYNPm/YDvyWPSHYSOk8FwdxXgCfV448 +uyo3fxNO5SliBCQldudMuw= =o6nm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--386417094--