From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jan 28 10:24:36 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CuanM-0003zi-Ex
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:24:36 -0800
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:24:36 -0800
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: the year 2000
Message-ID: <20050128182436.GJ20235@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <1ef.344abac8.2f2ba0e4@wmconnect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1ef.344abac8.2f2ba0e4@wmconnect.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 1075
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:06:28AM -0500, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote:
> In a message dated 2005-01-27 5:25:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
> ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:
> 
> 
> >     pa    
> >     -- "the first"
> >     pa pi'e re
> >     -- "the first of February"
> >     pa pi'e re pi'e pa ki'o
> >     -- "the first of February of 2000"
> >     pa ki'o
> >     -- "the year 2000"
> >     pa ki'o pi'e ci
> >     -- "March of the year 2000"
> >     pa ki'o pi'e ci pi'e vo
> >     -- "the 4th of March of the year 2000"
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't these all have "re ki'o" instead of "pa ki'o"?

Yes.  This was covered in another mail.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/