From jon@happyvalley.eclipse.co.uk Sun Feb 27 05:48:20 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([212.104.129.139]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D5OmN-0002XV-QC for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:48:19 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF31134340 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:48:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17599-01-28 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:48:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [82.152.43.82] (unknown [82.152.43.82]) by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CFD134292 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:48:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4221D07D.2080502@happyvalley.eclipse.co.uk> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:51:57 +0000 From: Jon Reeves User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .eosai ko viska le ckule jibri be mi References: <421EA747.80406@gulik.co.nz> <537d06d0050225032046d7f713@mail.gmail.com> <421F8831.5060601@gulik.co.nz> <422083BE.3030806@happyvalley.eclipse.co.uk> <20050227093902.GD26916@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20050227093902.GD26916@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk X-archive-position: 1180 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jon@happyvalley.eclipse.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners aha, things make more sense now ki'e robin. Robin Lee Powell wrote: >On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:12:14PM +0000, Jon Reeves wrote: > > >>.ui ki'e la filip. >> >>The la seems to be omitted a lot - i don't think it is optional >>though? >> >> > >Yes; la is optional after any COI or DOI. > >-Robin > > >