From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 16 09:53:40 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DBciC-0007Mv-IE for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:40 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DBci9-0007M1-D0 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:40 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so3339750wri for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=rrOj0uJ8oA2oyN+nmo6u7j4Q6FwLe6kuNDlGML7AGW/4F8f4nsQqYB5ODqx27oEUSi1CWaUKCYCEC2+kdvwXecSnSYpGzcmXKZvRX9/NUtkQ96eQRP0JkqcNYCg6ON33a4vPSDTseBO7+LS4inrFr2vkr+60R7OUHTuaVJ6qw6o= Received: by 10.54.84.17 with SMTP id h17mr2766899wrb; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.35.76 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:53:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <12d58c1605031609531f4c2a52@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:05 -0500 From: Adam COOPER To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: nu fanva zoi gy. I pledge allegiance... .gy In-Reply-To: <20050316164044.5627.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20050316164044.5627.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1263 X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners > Oops, I meant {ca'e}, not {ce'a}. {ca'e} marks the sentence as a > performative, which I think is what you want here. You're not > just describing a situation, you are pledging/forfeiting by saying > those words. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes Hmmmmm... I'm not so sure. A promise of allegiance does not constitute actual allegiance. A set of actions constitutes allegiance. I think that's built into the notion of promise/nupre; the promise defines a series of actions or a pattern of behavior to be performed in the future. As for forfeit, I don't forfeit by saying "I forfeit", I forfeit by removing my staff from the lands in question, informing the tenants that I can & will no longer collect their rents, stuff like that. What actually happens is that I pledge allegiance, I actually forfeit lands, & then later I break my pledge. .oi ro'o stedu be mi zo'o .i mu'o mi'e .adam.