From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 11 07:57:14 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DL0Li-0003kG-DW for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:57:14 -0700 Received: from new.e-mol.com ([65.169.135.18] helo=mole.e-mol.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.44) id 1DL0Lf-0003jO-96 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:57:14 -0700 Received: from mail.123.net (nobody@new.e-mol.com [65.169.135.18]) by mole.e-mol.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with SMTP id j3BEucTd032528 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:56:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:56:38 -0400 Message-Id: <200504111456.j3BEucTd032528@mole.e-mol.com> To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org From: Matt Arnold Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban? In-Reply-To: <20050408232158.GQ26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20050408204144.GC26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050408232158.GQ26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Priority: 3 X-From: mattarn@mail.123.net X-Originating-IP: [209.220.229.254] Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 1372 X-Approved-By: mattarn@123.net X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: mattarn@123.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners When a root word has more than one abbreviated form, is there ever a rationale to use one and not the other in a particular compound word? The only reason I have ever thought of was to prevent unpronouncable consonant combinations. - epkat _______________________________________________________ Sent through e-mol. E-mail, Anywhere, Anytime. http://www.e-mol.com