From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 10 15:18:19 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 10 May 2005 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DVd3T-00009t-Q6
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:18:19 -0700
Received: from mxsrv2.tranzpeer.net ([202.180.66.215])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1DVd3S-00009R-DA
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:18:19 -0700
Received: from [203.184.28.13] (helo=gulik.co.nz)
	by mxsrv2.tranzpeer.net with ESMTP (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DVd2u-0004nT-Go
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:17:44 +1200
Message-ID: <4281330B.1080205@gulik.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:17:47 +1200
From: Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg@gulik.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040216 Debian/1.6.x.1-10
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: [ANN] LearnLojban version 0.0.2
References: <42808FD0.6010100@gulik.co.nz> <200505101235.j4ACZkTd006191@mole.e-mol.com> <42812D2E.5040704@gulik.co.nz> <20050510215559.GY22872@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050510215559.GY22872@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 1440
X-Approved-By: mikevdg@gulik.co.nz
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: mikevdg@gulik.co.nz
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

Robin Lee Powell wrote:

>On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:52:46AM +1200, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>  
>
>>Oooh... now that's a good idea. Umm.. I guess the problem would be that 
>>the definitions are all in English, so the only Lojban word in there 
>>would be the one that you're learning. I
>>    
>>
>
>Don't you have the cf. entries in there as well?
>
>klama, for example has:
>
>(cf. cadzu, bajra, marce, vofli, litru, muvdu, cpare, cmavo list
>ka'a, pluta, bevri, farlu, limna, vitke)
>  
>
Oh yes; they're there.

Mikevdg.