From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 31 09:24:10 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dd9XG-0007KG-Jg for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:24:10 -0700 Received: from mx18.yandex.ru ([213.180.200.18]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dd9X7-0007Ju-O1 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:24:10 -0700 Received: from h119.keldysh.ru ([194.226.57.119]:11274 "EHLO [194.226.57.119]" smtp-auth: "deletesoftware" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S3375743AbVEaQXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 20:23:49 +0400 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at mx18.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: deletesoftware Message-ID: <429C8FD4.8060607@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:24:52 +0400 From: "Aleksej R. Serdyukov" Organization: Delete Software Limited User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: seldetri References: <4299DD5E.8030105@yandex.ru> <20050531022313.GT21667@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <429C3694.9040006@yandex.ru> <20050531145715.GF21667@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20050531145715.GF21667@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1481 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: deletesoftware@yandex.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Robin Lee Powell wrote: >>>>.i ma cu tadji bo cusku be lu le pixra be zo'e ku poi seldetri zo'e li'u >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Am I right >>>> that this is >>>> ungrammatical for >>>> {lo pixra}? >>> >>> >>>What? >>> >>>The sentence is grammatical. What is it you're wondering about? >> >>The question was - how to say (shortly) "the picture of ... is dated ..."? Ahem, sorry, forgot to answer your one. > No, the question was "Is this sentence grammatical?". My question > is, which part of the sentence bothers you? > > The way to say that is "tu'a le pixra be da cu se detri de", for > some da and de. I mean that... {mi ba do} means "I exist after you exist", right? Then doesn't it mean for a picture to be {seldetri} that it exists at the date?