From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 13 03:07:15 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E3sv4-00067C-Jm
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:07:14 -0700
Received: from mx14.yandex.ru ([213.180.200.14])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E3suy-00066s-M9
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:07:14 -0700
Received: from h125.keldysh.ru ([194.226.57.125]:32128 "EHLO [194.226.57.125]"
	smtp-auth: "deletesoftware" TLS-CIPHER: "RC4-MD5 keybits 128/128 version
	TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: <none>) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP
	id S1782569AbVHMKHA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>);
	Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:07:00 +0400
X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at mx14.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: deletesoftware
Message-ID: <42FDBCC2.2090705@yandex.ru>
Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:26:26 +0400
From:	"Aleksej R. Serdyukov" <deletesoftware@yandex.ru>
Organization: Delete Software Limited
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:	lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Hello!
References: <20050812102918.B434.SERVANTODEHOMARO@yahoo.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20050812102918.B434.SERVANTODEHOMARO@yahoo.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1700
X-Approved-By: deletesoftware@yandex.ru
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: deletesoftware@yandex.ru
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

Servanto de Homaro wrote:
> I'm a Japanese Jojban beginner.  I'm very poor at English, and
> please put up with my strange English.

Not much worse than mine, if any. <G>

>      1.  .ongous.djun.itcirous.
[...and other...]
Maybe {dz}'d be better than {dj}? Though a little more difficult to 
pronounce.