From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 13 13:44:30 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E42rl-0007uO-W7 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:30 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E42rh-0007uG-LW for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:29 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so826782wra for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pfa7IjnPMVipArbPfWEjJ4MISk8WxICx6FBzyiKxP+68e0miUCFxJ1kXxkaJKqDT4aw/YVbTcpsXX7Xhn40wyC/rLX9+IVe70fFQmQbQQ6EBS8uGkgpEuHSB9XRG1IkZs21UeTLc2vWvNSIK6yWYiTCFDWWfERhgCZ8kTpDAJ7c= Received: by 10.54.143.7 with SMTP id q7mr2696175wrd; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.68.12 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050813134458aa98d1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:44:23 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: threats In-Reply-To: <42FD4FB0.9050105@handgranat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <42FD4FB0.9050105@handgranat.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1715 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 8/12/05, Sunnan wrote: > Is {.i ko smaji .ijonai mi cecla fa'a do} grammatical and does it mean > (roughly) "shut up or I'll shoot you"? > If not, what are your suggested improvements? {ijonai} contains both a threat and a promise: If you don't shut up, then I'll shoot you (the threat). If you do shut up, then I won't shoot you (the promise). Given the rest of the lyrics, I think the person making the threat is not making any promises along with it. With {ija} there is only the threat, you keep your options open in case they do shut up. > ps. bonus question, totally unrelated: > > I'm having a hard time grokking NU1 cmavo. Say I want to express "kiss" > as a noun, like in "I miss his kisses". Is it {zu'ocinba}, {pu'ucinba} > or neither? {mi claxu cinmo la da zu'ocinba} make any sense? I'd say {nu cinba}. {nu} covers all {zu'o}, {pu'u}, {za'i} and {mu'e}, so you don't really need to choose between them. Ordinarily, I'd say a kiss is {lo mu'e cinba}. I'd say that {lo zu'o cinba} is more like "his kissing" than "his kisses", focusing more in the action itself. {pu'u cinba} only if the kiss goes through different stages, which is also a possibility in some cases I suppose. As for missing, I'd say either make a lujvo {mi caucni lo nu cinba} or else it will be {mi cinmo lo nu claxu lo nu cinba}. Because {mi cinmo lo nu cinba} says you are feeling the kiss. mu'o mi'e xorxes