From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 14 06:58:43 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E4J0d-0007Ua-Ld
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:43 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E4J0Z-0007US-MK
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:43 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so898235wra
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ltiZ1NOL5QqBbw3o68JdVk8Uz+2PgOJ5GoJgOxE9EH8hHJ4SYvOPExtUZoanTyiy6jr40Uxt/9NzRvU7lanhbn5UaK0t6SRhUjLRgGD1zJJTRFTZjOySUdnA3jgmP2FpgUap2TLntzhSlo4FWMIYdbsx2pLmNkKjuft7DJKOMyA=
Received: by 10.54.37.64 with SMTP id k64mr3086861wrk;
        Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.68.12 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605081406585e67f535@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:58:38 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: threats
In-Reply-To: <42FE6540.5030900@handgranat.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42FD4FB0.9050105@handgranat.org>
	 <925d1756050813134458aa98d1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <42FE6540.5030900@handgranat.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1721
X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On 8/13/05, Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org> wrote:
> Much better, thanks! I've changed it to {ija} on the page, but let me
> rephrase the question: is a boolean a good way to express a threat? Is
> {ko smaji .ija mi cecla fa'a do} a reasonable sentence?

I always get the feeling that something is missing here, because
there is no causality implied between the two sentences, but I don't
really have anything better to suggest at this point, so...

mu'o mi'e xorxes