From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 16 17:35:27 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E5Btu-00005Q-Rv
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:35:26 -0700
Received: from dionysos.oderland.com ([213.115.211.26])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(Exim 4.52)
	id 1E5Btq-00005I-2u
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:35:26 -0700
Received: from c-c6f8e253.1210-16-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([83.226.248.198])
	by dionysos.oderland.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
	id 1E5BuV-0002wZ-Nj
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:36:03 +0200
Message-ID: <430285A2.6040108@handgranat.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:32:34 +0200
From: Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: alice questions
References: <737b61f30508141443b15fcc7@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560508161657244f2bb8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <925d17560508161657244f2bb8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dionysos.oderland.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - handgranat.org
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 1745
X-Approved-By: sunnan@handgranat.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: sunnan@handgranat.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

la xorxes. pu finti:

>On 8/14/05, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>First, {bo}. When you see the sequence {i PU bo}, does that mean that
>>bo is grouping the two bridi together, using the sense of the PU cmavo
>>used?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, more generally any {i <tag> bo}.
>  
>
e'o ko jarco lo mupli

>
>>Third. In {i la'e di'u no'e ba'e mutce le ka cizra}, what kind of
>>cadence might that be spoken with? Is stress usually put on {ba'e}, or
>>on the next word? 
>>    
>>
>
>One theory is that you could/should read it in a monotone, the emphasis being
>taken care of just by the presence of {ba'e}. I would emphasize the next word,
>never {ba'e}.  
>  
>
I would like to read it:  "i LA'e DI'u NO'e BA'e MUTce le ka CIZra", 
with mutce as a lot more stressed than the other words. Sort of like a 
little melody.

>  
>
>>And in {leka} and {lenu}, is stress usually put on
>>the first or second cmavo?
>>    
>>
>
>I tend to stress the second if any, and don't usually write them together.
>  
>
I love writing them together and I like to put stress on both, though 
more on the second.