From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 19 17:00:27 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6Gmh-0000Jp-4g for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:27 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E6Gmf-0000Ji-Ac for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:26 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so482340nzp for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=D9UiiykbKCokJFLph022L1WILgUr6IDnKeP4tV2rEywliA+Ts5UOowGw/iPQdPLCH3hEC/40FJc7Qd36amt/gYQhETuqEdDFg6d8aPN3gWTEtDzK0Bdf5l46C1g/wbfFyMQzjNLOxJwmOO2XUaDBcDh1qkJMwBBg7NzjN6X1Xpg= Received: by 10.37.15.57 with SMTP id s57mr2847513nzi; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.222.64 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0508191700767a9e0b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:00:24 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why 16 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4589_29719617.1124496024489" References: <2d3df92a050819014471077557@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 1792 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_4589_29719617.1124496024489 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Umm... we're not speaking about the same issue. :) My question was about basic names for digits, from {no} to {vai}: why do we= =20 have exactly 16 of them? I understand the usefulness of hexa digits, but for that reason we could=20 also use a hundred or even more basic numbers, as those cover 16 as well. S= o=20 what's the point (of 16)? > coi .xiliodor. I thought that was rather .xili,odor., no? :) heliodor ------=_Part_4589_29719617.1124496024489 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Umm... we're not speaking about the same issue. :)
My question was about basic names for digits, from {no} to {vai}: why = do we have exactly 16 of them?
I understand the usefulness of hexa digits, but for that reason w= e could also use a hundred or even more basic numbers, as those cover 16 as= well. So what's the point (of 16)?
 
> coi .xiliodor.
I thought that was rather .xili,odor., no? :)
 
heliodor
------=_Part_4589_29719617.1124496024489--