From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Aug 25 05:14:15 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8GcZ-0007sF-FM for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:15 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8GcY-0007s4-8C for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:15 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so186569nzp for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sW3RCUv+jTvlXE0Dr438zZ3WwvsfbtWtszsHqWr8FoaGuEzZj34sEgFREddVhAV7yDBJP+BAtgCI6J2vqpQSOOS4hp5x/kwXPDoTNLLoNQKHLhB5eC1bNF9Ok+Gf+CUNDzWAR9yQgVqjxMtChjLQDMpxsbsch/CUEEfe8hf1RrY= Received: by 10.36.251.45 with SMTP id y45mr70900nzh; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.222.64 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a050825051450bec27a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:14:13 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ...to say 'coi' In-Reply-To: <737b61f305082210137f2dcf3a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1227_22726320.1124972053489" References: <2d3df92a05082208073c6f585a@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f305082208432b723a45@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a05082209005d20946c@mail.gmail.com> <5ccdc75305082209337950cb49@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f305082210137f2dcf3a@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 1856 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_1227_22726320.1124972053489 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline >=20 > Regardless of all this, in my example ({fe la alis. cukta fa ti la > lu,es. karol}), I wasn't explicitly putting the third sumti into the > second place, but putting it after a first-place sumti. Since it > wasn't tagged, {la lu,es. karol} ends up being in the third place of > {cukta}. This is CLL 9.3.7 and thereabouts. 9.3.9 says that when you > tag multiple sumti with the same FA cmavo, you're really making a > separate claim for each individual combination of sumti. So there's no > overwriting going on. >=20 > {fa .abu fa by. > broda > fe cy. fe dy. fe .ebu > fi fy. > fo gy.} >=20 > is really making six separate claims, one for each combination of sumti. Hmph... logical. More logical then my supposition. mi'e .xili,odor. ------=_Part_1227_22726320.1124972053489 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Regardless of all this, in my ex= ample ({fe la alis. cukta fa ti la
lu,es. karol}), I wasn't explicitly p= utting the third sumti into the
second place, but putting it after a first-place sumti. Since it
was= n't tagged, {la lu,es. karol} ends up being in the third place of
{cukta= }. This is CLL 9.3.7 and thereabouts. 9.3.9 says that when you
tag multi= ple sumti with the same FA cmavo, you're really making a
separate claim for each individual combination of sumti. So there's no<= br>overwriting going on.

{fa .abu fa by.
broda
fe cy. fe dy. f= e .ebu
fi fy.
fo gy.}

is really making six separate claims, on= e for each combination of sumti.
Hmph... logical. More logical then my supposition.
 
mi'e .xili,odor.
------=_Part_1227_22726320.1124972053489--