From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 26 04:32:56 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8cS7-000697-W6 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:32:56 -0700 Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de ([139.1.44.13]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8cS3-00068v-LJ for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:32:55 -0700 Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7QBWmSh021907 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0200 Received: from GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp (gddebesapp004.de.gedas-grp [10.242.64.42]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7QBWmd6021901 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp ([139.1.84.54]) by GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A question about se Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:32:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2005 11:32:48.0628 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2DE8340:01C5AA31] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 1872 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Chris Capel wrote: > On 8/26/05, Newton, Philip wrote: > > la .ZAkyris. cu cusku di'e > > > Or is se one of those cmavo that can > > > be placed anywhere in a bridi, > > > > No. It has to precde the brivla it modifies -- but it modifies a > > brivla, not necessarily a selbri. > > Well, it modifies a "selbri", but not necessarily the whole > selbri of the bridi--it only modifies the next > brivla-or-equivalent following it. OK, I guess. But I was using "selbri" in its sense of "se bridi" -- that is, the predicate relationship underlying a whole bridi, not one of its components (even if that component is, itself, subdivided into subcomponents). > But you can use it to > modify a whole complex selbri, like this: > > le nu mi klama cu se ke drani tcika la daucac. Ah OK, with {ke}, yeah. I can see that. That's still not modifying the entire selbri, but I'll grant that it modifies more than just one brivla. mu'o mi'e .filip.