From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 26 08:04:50 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E8flC-0001c8-66
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:50 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E8fl7-0001bt-Cl
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:50 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so265296wra
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=BMB3chtaz2yUGFNAMlWT1t86U1hi7pYH/LcRWD0AFbwPtFGiZFohlVmxjUjj4jsYCVin+ednfBcvAHxvYtsrVrmXHd87PHlzYfpJZEbC4sGe6uqxZyXcuiw30SGznTk6IvwND7AqNXvEQSyZS3WrsknGt2w70a0sx5aqoQhTgqQ=
Received: by 10.54.24.13 with SMTP id 13mr3338124wrx;
        Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.7 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d1756050826080414dabb90@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:04:41 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pronounciation problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508260941290.16694@hive.cec.wustl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <H00061428e6cf5f9.1124738232.seurat.artisan.calpoly.edu@MHS>
	 <e6663d2005082215173230c4f7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <430AEC2D.10304@handgranat.org> <430B4434.6050704@yandex.ru>
	 <e6663d2005082406314fa8813@mail.gmail.com>
	 <430D7455.8030104@yandex.ru>
	 <925d1756050825052155672919@mail.gmail.com>
	 <430E0F4E.1040206@yandex.ru>
	 <925d175605082606081d285990@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508260941290.16694@hive.cec.wustl.edu>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1875
X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On 8/26/05, Adam D. Lopresto <adam@pubcrawler.org> wrote:

> So would it be {tei tycy foi}?

In this case probably {sy ce cy ce zy ce jy ce ty cy}  
(is that a tonguetwister or what?) would seem to be enough, 
since there is no need to set  {ty cy} appart from anything 
else, but yes, {tei ... foi} would group them together. 
(But in either case we wouldn't pronounce the combination 
in question.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes