From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 26 11:24:00 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8irv-0005f6-Tg for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:24:00 -0700 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.204]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8irq-0005ez-2J for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:23:59 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so679068rnf for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=fX6mc5in50DTVSOQomQZZ4p8Qx3U+QD7QZvlJCMtShkGZLRlMmTj43Io3fW/suLrFDGizdjpB9nDeLgGIghHZ7oMiOiVnz7R3xJYKwPgI0tk0HO56MckpdX4hlXK/IeVZiQ6sd3JGzbSvmxEf4NoY7+ERV1P8wc2BR7eQOVnLjI= Received: by 10.38.11.11 with SMTP id 11mr1884932rnk; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [67.143.21.246]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id a29sm2858292rng.2005.08.26.11.23.48; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3746A155-AB37-4461-9947-DBA5F1E6DD0D@gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A question about se Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:23:39 -0500 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org From: Zachary X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1883 X-Approved-By: vyseofarcadia17@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: vyseofarcadia17@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Ah, yes! That helps quite a bit! Thank you very much. I think I'm finally getting it. mi'e .ZAkyris. On Aug 26, 2005, at 1:15 PM, Newton, Philip wrote: > la .Zakyris. cu cusku di'e > >> Hmm... I think I get it. It's like {le nabmi mlatu} >> would be "the problem cat" but {le mlatu se nabmi} >> would be "the problem encountered by the cat" and >> {le mlatu nabmi} would be "the cat that is a problem" >> and {le nabmi se mlatu} would be "the cat of a >> problematic breed". Or am a still missing something? >> > > Close! You still seem to have problems with sumti based on a tanru > with a > tertau containing SE. > > {le nabmi mlatu} would be "the problem-ish cat", or "the problem cat". > {le mlatu se nabmi} is a kind of {se nabmi}, so a kind of problem > encounterer. Perhaps "the cat-ish problem encounterer", or "the cat > who > encountered a problem". > {le mlatu nabmi} would be "the cat-ish problem", so maybe "the cat > that is a > problem" (but the place structure is that of {nabmi}, not that of > {mlatu}, > though there are ways around this, e.g. involving {co}) > {le nabmi se mlatu} would be "the problem-ish breed of cat" -- it's > a kind > of {se mlatu}, so a kind of breed. > > If you want a kind of cat, whose breed happens to be problematic, you > probably want something like {le mlatu be lo nabmi} "the cat with- > breed a > problem", using {be} to link an argument. > > Oh, and "the problem encountered by the cat" is a kind of problem, > so a kind > of {nabmi}. If you want to say that it's the kind (x1) of nabmi > that has the > cat as x2, {be} is again what you want -- {le nabmi be le mlatu} or, > somewhat literally, "the problem with-encounterer the cat". > > Does that help any? > > mu'o mi'e .filip. > > > >