From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 27 04:54:44 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8zGm-0007E7-JW for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:54:44 -0700 Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de ([139.1.44.13]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8zGi-0007Dz-5R for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:54:44 -0700 Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7RBsbSh002339 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:54:37 +0200 Received: from GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp (gddebesapp004.de.gedas-grp [10.242.64.42]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7RBsbd6002333 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:54:37 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp ([139.1.84.54]) by GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:54:38 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Let's go Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:54:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2005 11:54:38.0011 (UTC) FILETIME=[19BC40B0:01C5AAFE] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 1888 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners la .cuncuxnas. cu cusku di'e > coi rodo > > I know I've probably read this somewhere before, > but the information simply won't come up when I > try to recall it. How does one say something > like "Let's go!" in Lojban? It feels like it falls > somewhere between {mi'o klama} and {ko klama}. > Things like {mi e ko klama} pop to mind, but seem > very strange indeed. That could work. The first thing that popped into my mind was {.e'o mi klama}. Maybe {.e'u mi'o klama} is better, though. mu'o mi'e .filip.