From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 28 16:31:08 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E9WcG-0001Ed-Ca
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:08 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E9WcD-0001ES-3r
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:08 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i24so559248wra
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=WWstELQfti6x4ekcFCX64ymkASVi273Waqsye1BcWjrpYil6Svldowg5Hy/DWrfePn6Y3oHuCtYIKkVXx8NWudDpL7G1hEU4m0iKoGkputivBlJKqTDHfI80LXnd51d9Qxw7vFbrMdqGefXonmLgofTf10Raqz1qJq/CuQ1VRLc=
Received: by 10.54.144.7 with SMTP id r7mr5657781wrd;
        Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.140.6 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e6663d2005082816311558fee3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:31:03 -0400
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban flag, my take
In-Reply-To: <4310EE62.3060608@hypermetrics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4310EE62.3060608@hypermetrics.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1892
X-Approved-By: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

I would recognize that as a Lojban flag even if I hadn't been told. I
think the horizontal/vertical lines need to be thicker.
-epkat.

On 8/27/05, Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that there seem to be slight variations
> in the Lojban flag (or variants on it). This isn't
> unusual in vexillology, as there are variants on (for
> example) the Vatican flag.
> 
> So I decided to create my own variant.
> 
> The basic changes are:
> 
>    - separated the circles in the Venn diagram, so the
>      center looks less busy and more balanced
>    - made the lines a little bolder
>    - removed the arrows from the xy axes
>    - extended the axes to the edge of the flag
> 
> I've stuck it at: http://hypermetrics.com/personal/lojban.gif
> 
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 
> Hal
> 
> 
> 
> 
>