From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 28 18:29:05 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E9YSP-00039H-8K for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:29:05 -0700 Received: from ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.40] helo=ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E9YSH-00038q-4r for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:29:05 -0700 Received: from hypermetrics.com (cpe-66-68-164-156.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.164.156]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j7T1SrH9019157 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:28:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <431264D5.8070400@hypermetrics.com> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:28:53 -0500 From: Hal Fulton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban flag, my take References: <4310EE62.3060608@hypermetrics.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1894 X-Approved-By: hal9000@hypermetrics.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: hal9000@hypermetrics.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Matt Arnold wrote: > I would recognize that as a Lojban flag even if I hadn't been told. I > think the horizontal/vertical lines need to be thicker. I wanted to keep them a little thin so as to make it clear they are more lines than bars. I'll look into it again. Hal > -epkat. > > On 8/27/05, Hal Fulton wrote: > >>I've noticed that there seem to be slight variations >>in the Lojban flag (or variants on it). This isn't >>unusual in vexillology, as there are variants on (for >>example) the Vatican flag. >> >>So I decided to create my own variant. >> >>The basic changes are: >> >> - separated the circles in the Venn diagram, so the >> center looks less busy and more balanced >> - made the lines a little bolder >> - removed the arrows from the xy axes >> - extended the axes to the edge of the flag >> >>I've stuck it at: http://hypermetrics.com/personal/lojban.gif >> >> >>Comments? >> >> >>Hal >> >> >> >> >> > > > >