From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 29 06:50:27 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E9k1q-0000pu-V9 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:27 -0700 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E9k1m-0000pm-LE for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:26 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h31so579376wxd for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Id2W+FjhZkU2U9OUQDy13wHkX/aEuOYTI60UFN3RdXZDUvRe2jFsgylf9lcf01CBQn5WlEU9djr3aTCz/pR/EOYktnDHSEPtfPnoioWagykAzItApPRRrsWYXoPyUtuWLRc7s2Y+CiIOpzZ0lnCDbyCMolKmuKb+0c3phOB6cpE= Received: by 10.70.62.12 with SMTP id k12mr97908wxa; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.2 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <12d58c1605082906502af0528a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:50:21 -0400 From: Adam COOPER To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fanva lo nuzba In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19634_5998874.1125323421309" References: X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 1897 X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_19634_5998874.1125323421309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline la filip cu cusku di'e >=20 > la .komfo,amonan. cu cusku di'e > > se cusku la petr bratn po lo briju po lo ralca'i po la sualbard >=20 > I wonder whether it wouldn't have been more Lojbanic to use {be} rather= =20 > than {po} >=20 > In this case, it could probably have been {la petr bratn po lo briju be l= o=20 > ralca'i be la sualbard}. iecai ------=_Part_19634_5998874.1125323421309 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline la filip cu cusku di'e
la .komfo,amonan. cu cusku di'= e
> se cusku la petr bratn po lo briju po lo ralca'i po la sualbard
I wonder whether it wouldn't have been more Lojbanic to use {be} rather th= an {po}

In this case, it could probably have been {la petr bratn po = lo briju be lo ralca'i be la sualbard}.

iecai

------=_Part_19634_5998874.1125323421309--